Please try to address only this specific issue.
2006-06-26
21:09:48
·
7 answers
·
asked by
ClintH
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
I am somewhat familiar with Newton, and I think he would agree that there is clearly a force (the bottom of the tower) acting upon the falling body (the top of the tower) which should slow the fall of the building.
2006-06-26
21:20:33 ·
update #1
Stickfiguresk... The twin towers were not so unique that laws of physics did not matter. "The evidence in that video is complete garbage." I am looking to address a very specific piece of info. "It sounds just like the things I've heard about the JFK assassination" (you believe lee harvey oswald acted alone?)... "and bunches of other conspiracy crap." I assume you are refering to the official report. A CONSPIRACY THEORY.
2006-06-26
21:26:28 ·
update #2
Panacea... Thank you for a well thought out response, but I must disagree. You start out, "The structure is essentially hollow." Except for the huge beams that support the building. "As it collapses, the force acting upward against gravity is suddenly removed." This would only seem to be the case if someone removed it. "Or rather, it is dispersed in all directions as opposed to working in one direction." Newton: Objects at rest stay at rest unless acted upon by another object.--they dont disperse in all directions before the force acts upon them. You go on to talk about how "All modern structures are built around this concept," followed by talk of how they involve a "delicate system." I am no engineer, but nothing about those buildings seem delicate to me. And if it is so delicate why don't more building fall? Why not just blow out one floor of a big building and watch it fall? I hope your analysis is incorrect. Otherwise they are all just houses of cards.
2006-06-26
21:57:38 ·
update #3
One more thing Panacea, if all that were try why would controlled demolition be considered such a difficult undertaking. If what you say were true it all seem very easy to me.
2006-06-26
22:00:02 ·
update #4
In a cascading gravity-driven collapse (the "pancake theory"), each floor of the building should have offered at least a modicum of resistance before giving way, with the inertia of the increasing debris forcing itself through less and less resistance as the towers fell.
The WTC buildings falling at free-fall speed can only be explained by a lack of resistance in any intervening floors all the way to the foundation, meaning complete simultaneous (or rapidly sequential) instant failure of most support and core columns. Before and after 9/11, this has only been achieved in a controlled demolition environment.
Testing of metal samples of the core columns with supporting evidence of molten metal found at the site 3 weeks AFTER 9/11 have shown large quantities of thermate by-products, an acid-like cutting agent where a very small amount can be used to cut cleanly through metal. This analysis has been conducted using WTC steel samples provided for WTC memorials at 3 separate universities and is quite conclusive, moreso than DNA evidence.
With the scientific evidence clearly stacked on the side of "controlled demolition", the greatest obstacle to any 9/11 Truth movement is the psychological factor. Most people just don't understand science and are quite afraid of it, easily able to dismiss it when any fast-talking pundit counters with a senseless 15-second sound bite. Most Americans have been thoroughly conditioned to this "hard science is just another opinion" mentality that is making us a joke in the rest of the world, and thoroughly helping our business competitors in the world to import our jobs.
2006-06-26 21:25:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by lostinromania 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
You don't understand Newton as well as you think. The structure is essentially hollow. As it collapses, the force acting upward against gravity is suddenly removed. Or rather, it is dispersed in all directions as opposed to working in one direction. That's how an arch works. All modern structures are built around this concept. When perfectly aligned tremendous potential energy is focussed into a single point to counteract the incredible forces involved. But, it's a delicate thing. Move these structure out of alignment and the counteracting force is dispersed.
The towers didn't fall because they were shattered. They fell because the delicate system of balance necessary to hold them up was disrupted. Since every part of the system relies on every other part of the system, the whole system collapsed at once.
This is an advanced structural phenomenon that the average person, quite frankly, is not capable of understanding. That's why it takes a team of engineers to design a building, not a bunch of yahoos off the street.
Here is an analogy to help you understand. When you build a house of cards, the structure is relatively stable. But, what happens if you smack it? Does a small part of it fall over while the rest is intact? Does it slowly fall down in stages? No. The whole thing collapses at once in a blink of an eye. Same thing with the towers.
2006-06-26 21:33:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Please try and calm your mind and lets take a deep breath and exhale , that's nice, now lets just review the reality of newtons law regarding gravity and how it relates to any object placed into the motion. It's no big deal, it is very simple to understand, if you concentrate and imagine an object falling . Let's say a potato falling from say a 100 story building. Here's basicly what newton claimed and what has been proven to be absolutily true , 100% of the time, no matter what, It is a given that; Any object that is moving because of gravity is said to be free falling. This objects acceleration during it's fall is constant and equal to g which is 9.8 meters per second. Using this constant anyone could calculate the exact speed of a free falling object and easily determine how long it would take that object to hit the ground. This is the honest to god truth and science has proved it time and time again. OK , stay with me now for just another minute here Neocons. A free falling object must not contain any factors which might hinder it's free fall, and if there were such factors like solid concrete, or fire resistant solid steel beams or just tons of matter in between the object and the ground, well then, they would slow that sucker down, In the case of the speed at which or the amount of time it took for the WTC Twin Towers and building 7 WTC to hit the ground defunks Newtons law , which is impossible because there was so much mass and solid matter within the 3 falling buildings, that the speed and time they reached to hit the groundcould never , in a billion years could they get close to the speed of free fall! BUT THEY DID!!! Listen folks those buildings were built of concrete and steel they were loaded with human beings wires telephones , papers and everything else that buildings contain, If you think you can possibly explain the speed and duration of demise on a pancake theory, you had better go fish because that is outragous, and totally impossible. It is so impossible that their is not a person on this planet in there right mind who could declare otherwise!!! So thats the end of that Thank God!Don't run away asshole, murdering bastards, let's answer the question, but lets quit with the science lessons and get it overwith once and for all!! Goddamn you if you are blocking, you know and I know the reality of this problem, and it is simple! The buildings were imploded , period! No if's and's or butt's about it. Implosions are the only way to footprint a building and its done by exploding the insides first so that the outside drops precisely down and upon itself. THAT'S WHAT BROUGHT DOWN THOSE 3 BUILDINGS, if you won't believe it ask your god for help understanding those facts if you can't or won't comprehend these facts , you my friend are insane, I'm sorry to tell you this but you are madder than a Hatter, reality means nothing to you, you're gone! Ok let's get this implosion problem answered and who had to of known it was coming put to rest. Thermite was absolutilty found in the bowels and on the pieces of steel that Rudy Giliani didn't manage to sneak out of town before anyone could find it. George Bush's brother Marvin was in charge of Security for the above mentioned 3 buildings , his contract for that Security was to expire the next day, and Yes he did close down the buildings and shut down power several times before Sept. 11, 2001 and could not have not known who placed the thermite within the structural which created the implosions. If you don't think his brother George knew all about it, and was part of the plan , You my sick bastard should be shot, or at least kicked out this free country which WE made safe for you to ask such great questions. Period, end of story.
2006-06-27 00:39:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They were very huge, thus very heavy. And momentum is a power full thing. I've seen the video you're probably bugging out over. The twin towers were unique, thus acted uniquely to the planes crashing in to them. The evidence in that video is complete garbage. It sounds just like the things I've heard about the JFK assassination and bunches of other conspiracy crap.
2006-06-26 21:21:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by stickfiguresk 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gravity
2006-06-26 21:12:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
32 feet per second squared
read your Newton
2006-06-26 21:14:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mac Momma 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's called Physics!!!
2006-06-27 04:04:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USA) 2
·
0⤊
0⤋