Birth control for poor/AIDS infested countries?

Question

I've come to the conclusion that with the millions of dollars the the US pumps into poor countries we need to start using some of that money to provide them with birth control. It would atleast help the problem. Seriously, they know they don't have enough food for everyone, but they continue to have more and more babies. They know they have AIDS but they continue to have babies and pass it on to them. Am I being hateful? Or do you think this is a good idea?

I know the alot of countires that don't have enough food are that way because of wars (usually civil wars) I also know that in alot of countries that have a high AIDS rates the people farther from the cities don't even know what AIDS is. So, yeah. I do know the facts on what's going on. I also know that America spends ALOT of money to send doctors and medicine to those countries every year to help them to become informed.

Ummm if they're raped and they were on birthcontrol the would only have a 95% chance of getting pregnant, THUS lessening the chance of having a child as a result of that rape. AND if they get aids from being raped they'll have a 95% less chance of having a child with AIDS because of that rape. I'm not talking about condoms I'm talking about IUD's that can remain 99% effective for up to ten years.

that was supposed to say a 95% chance of not getting pregnant. Give me a break it's early.

Answer 1

It's not hateful, but AIDS is considered taboo, and the use of a condom is an admission of being infected. Unfortunately, the mindset of the people needs to change before organizations who have this idea can make a difference. Also, many countries have been missionized, and the people have been taught that the use of birth control is a sin.

Answer 2

I think that you may not have a good idea of what goes on in these countries and why they are that way. For one thing, everyone has the right to reproduce, whether you think so or not. I don't agree with someone making a conscious decision to have a child when they know they cannot properly take care of that child, but it happens everyday, in the US and around the world. In Africa, many people die of AIDS, many are children born to mothers with AIDS. Many of these women are raped, and that's how they get the disease, many are not safe from rape, and live in daily fear of being raped, they are not even safe to go take a bucket to get water for their families because there are men waiting to attack them. Many of these women become pregnant as a result. Birth control is ineffective when it comes to rape because the woman is not consenting to the act, and the man does not care. It's a common misconception among men with AIDS in certain parts of Africa that sex with a virgin will cure them of their disease, and these man rape and sometimes impregnate very young girls, girls that will die of AIDS through no fault of their own, and have to raise a child that will only end up dying as well. You're not being hateful, you just need a better understanding of what goes on in certain parts of the world.

Girls as young as three get raped daily in Africa, do you think girls (of reproductive age) regardless of whether or not they are married or having consensual sex should be on birth control, just in case they get raped?? How would you feel if you lived in a country where it was hard enough to get basic medical care, much less birth control, and you lived in constant fear of rape? How would you feel if you were only 11, and your mother made you go on birth control, and you are not having sex, but she insists that you go on it just in case you get raped?? Putting every single (or a good portion of females) on birth control would be very expensive, and shouldn't be the responsibility of the US. We have enough people here who have children they can't or won't care for.

Answer 3

In countries where mortality rates are so high, people sometimes regress to a more animalistic instinct of procreation; have as many children as possible in the hopes that at least one will survive to continue the bloodline.

Also, their culture is very different than ours so their motivations can seem alien to us.

Answer 4

Planed Parenthood receives funding from the federal authorities for low priced or maybe free birth control. besides the undeniable fact that many christian communities attempt to end their efforts to promote reproductive well being. because in addition they furnish abortion counseling. Witch dose no longer unavoidably recommend they recommend an same. There also are some religious communities who furnish free birth control to low income women persons. Many city's and states furnish this to boot. If a lady in u.s. desires low priced or free birth control it really is obtainable. it would want to take some study on her section yet that's no longer a intense cost to pay. convinced there's a threshold for qualifying and infrequently it style of feels unfair i,m optimistic. that's because the funding is constrained. it really is because anybody isn't nicely recommended of the importance of birth control. And in spite of each little thing might want to we no longer be held in charge for our moves. in spite of each little thing we are no longer required to have unprotected sex or sex in any respect it really is a call. a lady can discover out at the same time as she is ovulating and abstain some days previously and after that dose no longer look unreasonable to me. And a guy can save it in his pants only as surely. He may also pay for birth control can he no longer. So my factor the following is the position is the line? convinced we ought to continually help the position necessary yet might want to we take on the finished responsibility of a few ones sexual selections. the position is the line. Your question is amazingly interesting and laudable i furnish you with a celeb for it as no longer many have the foresight to evaluate it and it,s importance to society. a topic extremely nicely worth dialogue.

Answer 5

i am totally agree with ya ,, iam Egyptian and iam always ask my self that question but finally ya find customs and traditions and religion are serious constraints poor countries can't ignore coz they may be lose the only thing they get their legitimacy

Answer 6

I think it is a good idea--in fact, I'd like to see it required for those who choose to accept help from us to feed their families. However, how can we do that for those overseas that we subsidize and not to those on our own soil who choose to keep having children that they cannot/will not support?