It is the common concept of the chicken and the egg. Who came first? Or in this case, who started first?
One side will say, that's Israel land and they have the right to defend it.
Other will say, Palestine was invaded and they have the right to ripost with whatever they have; in this case, their own life.
Like I asked the other, it is interesting to notice the martyrs became terrorists after 9/11.
Rock throwers against tanks, what an even fight! When they will both have tanks and planes, then they could meet on the battlefield like the brainless twit of Christopher proposed.
2006-06-27 19:41:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rod b 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
The Israel connection in media across the world is too strong to give the Palestinian argument a fair hearing. I am well versed enough in the history of the Middle East to know that Israel has no business depriving the Palestinians of their Independence. The problem is that the Palestinians need to stop killing people in their acts of sabotage. The media rarely examine the reason for the Palestinians actions. The Palestinians need to go about garnering attention to their cause without the loss of life, and only then might they receive the sympathetic ear they deserve. Being an oppressed society is not a good enough reason to take the life of Israeli citizens, many of which sympathise with the Palestinian land grievances. If the Palestinians want any chance of applying appropriate International pressure to their cause they must simply give up bombing people. Has it ever occurred to a suicide bomber that someone on that bus might actually be on their side? If that is the case, how can it be justified that their life be taken from them?
2006-06-26 21:07:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ben C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think the Palestinian people are terrorists.It's just that this is how most of the media presents them like.Every time something happens there "poor" Israelis are the "victims",while Palestinians are "terrorists"(even if the Israeli army is doing a "mistake " and kills civilians it's their fault 'cos they were at the wrong place in the wrong time)...
2006-07-01 05:42:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tinkerbell05 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because to achieve your political aims you kill women and children on buses and at pizza restaurants. Your "brave soldiers" never face a genuine soldier on a battlefield. You prefer defenseless innocents.
I have news for you: There are no virgins in Hell. You'll see when you get there.
2006-06-26 21:00:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by christopher s 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldnt go for a bus ride/ go to crowded markets and blow up innocent people (not to mention myself). I might join a legit army and shoot at soilders/blow up soilders.
Why is it your land and not the Jews? Dont they feel the same way about you taking over their land long ago?
2006-06-26 20:58:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by ne0teric 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
because they defend for their country and sacrifice to it, and i think that this is their right and people don't have to think like this.for my point of view i don't think that Palestinians are terrors.
2006-06-26 21:09:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by omar g 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hmmm....Maybe because THEY STRAP EXPLOSIVES TO THEMSELVES AND BLOW UP THEMSELVES ALONG WITH MANY OTHER PEOPLE.
2006-06-26 20:56:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋