I'm considered as part of the "minority" group...but if and when minorities and people of color take over our government in a complete sense, it will be a living hell. These people have freedom and yet, they continue to live in the past. They have to shut up and let it go. Let's keep things the way they are. We are better off this way!
2006-06-27 04:08:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USA) 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I believe people vote for those board members and if they are voted in I don't think their race will matter.
The thing I don't understand is why anyone should get certain rights for the color of their skin. I don't get any special rights for being white. Who is the minorities that you are speaking of? Chris Rock said it best if you don't want to be treated like a minority then don't act like one. This day and age there is such a fear of being sued that you can't even fire someone for bad job performance if they are of any other race than white. However if you are a white man over 40 you are screwed. I am 26 year old female and even I see that.
Just to let you know I do know how it feels to be a minority I was the only white kid in my school for 5 years. On top of that I was poor and spoke with a Tennessee Accent but I had to deal with it. I didn't have a choice what color I was born. The teachers gave me a hard time because I wasn't like them. The kids were even worse but you know I made it through just fine.
Great question. Maybe this will bring more people out to vote.
2006-06-27 04:01:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Feather 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
First it violates the concept that Americans are Americans not some sub group or culture then American.
Second it violates the Constitution.
Third it effects more than people of that ethnic group. So it would introduce an instant prejudice in such situations. Though both sides would accuse them no matter what they did of showing preferential treatment.
Ethnic groups are artificial constraints. Within each ethnic group are many sub groups. As such you'd soon see this splitner into thousands of sub comittees. Let's take Black for example. You have Hispanic Blacks, American Blacks, Blacks from Africa, Carabean Blacks, Asian and Australian Blacks. That is just the ethnic breakdowns. Religion, politics, age, location in the country and a thousand other factors would lead to the Southern comunist Islamic carabean Black committee which might be in a virtual war with the Southern Democratic Protestant Baptist American Black committee.
In short the second you put something in front of American you've isolated yourself from the rest of the US. As a nation we are or are not all of the same nation. We can work toward a great nation or we can kill each other in a cival war. The choice is ours. Hyphonated Americans is a step to cival war.
2006-06-27 05:29:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by draciron 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I want a honest judge that knows his job, to bring me to court, one that will research the charges and facts, a congressman that wants the better for his people to make the laws, I want the truth to be before us all, reguardless of his color or culture.
The definition of a minority group can vary, depending on specific context, but generally refers to either a sub-group that does not form either a majority or a plurality of the total population, or a group that, while not necessarily a numerical minority, is disadvantaged or otherwise has less power (whether political or economic) than a dominant group. Examples of minorities in this latter context include women in some countries and African Americans in Mississippi in the 1920s.[1]
In a socio-economic context, the term "minority" tends to refer to groups of people who, according to a particular set of criteria, are fewer in population than other ethnic groups. All criteria for ethnicity have bearing on designating a minority — language, nationality, religion or culture. Often this means it is outnumbered by at least one other sub-group, but not always.
In politics, a minority government may be one which is formed by a party with a plurality of seats in the national legislature, when no majority party exists. AssumptionsIn the United States, the term minority typically refers to members of the non-white population, but as the numerical, social, economic, political and cultural influence of whites erodes over time in the US, and the "browning of America" is now an irreversible process, the wisdom of using the term "minority" to identify non-whites is increasingly questioned and considered offensive. In sociologyA majority, in sociological terms, is that segment of the population that outnumbers all others combined, one that is dominant. The term minority is unavoidably associated with the political movements which push for assimilation, in which the minority group sheds its distinctive traits and is absorbed into the dominant group.
Generally speaking, a minority is any disadvantaged group, regardless of their size in comparison to the rest of the population. An example would be blacks in South Africa under the apartheid system.
Example: Minorities in the Senate
Hiram Revels (R-MS)
African Americans:
Hiram R. Revels (R-Mississippi), 1870-71
Blanche K. Bruce (R-Mississippi), 1875-1881
Edward W. Brooke (R-Massachusetts), 1967-1979
Carol Moseley-Braun (D-Illinois), 1993-1999
Barack Obama (D-Illinois), 2005-
--------------------------------
Asian Americans:
Hiram L. Fong (R-Hawaii), 1959-1977
Daniel K. Inouye (D-Hawaii), 1963-
Samuel I. Hayakawa (R-California), 1977-1983
Spark M. Matsunaga (D-Hawaii), 1977-1990
Daniel K. Akaka (D-Hawaii), 1990-
-------------------------------------------
Hispanic Americans:
Octaviano Larrazolo (R-New Mexico), 1928-29
Dennis Chavez (D-New Mexico), 1935-1962
Joseph M. Montoya (D-New Mexico), 1964-77
Ken L. Salazar (D-Colorado), 2005-
Melquiades R. Martinez (R-Florida), 2005-
Robert Menendez (D-New Jersey), 2006-
-------------------------------
Native American Indian:
Charles Curtis (R-Kansas), 1907-13; 1915-29 (Kaw)
Robert Owen (D-Oklahoma), 1907-1925 (Cherokee)
Ben Nighthorse Campbell (R-Colorado), 1993-2005 (Northern Cheyenne)
2006-06-27 04:42:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by pdbpb 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
That has been a problem since segregation was banned. I think the law in general has "loop holes" that need to be closed. The same problem goes with The No Child Left Behind Act and school's falsifying test scores to the state/nation because of minority AND they get away with it.
2006-06-27 07:13:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Marj 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
if you had to do that, then we would too. I know it seems like our country is run by all whites, but if a person of color wanted to be president(and was eligable of course) then he certainly could... and would probably be elected as well... plus, america is trying to bring the races together not segregate them and that would make us even more separate than we already are... and everyone knows that is not what we want to happen. dont you want to be more unified as a country? that would eliminate all the work we have done so far so I believe that that is not the answer.
2006-06-27 03:54:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
After reading the thread titles and who posted them I would have to say you are spamming the forum.
Your heart is in the right place, but you are going about it all wrong.
2006-06-27 07:37:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dc3402 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You know, i saw a white man asking a black judge about his ruling the other day. Then the mexican policeman handcuffed him and the chinese policeman escorted him away.
2006-06-27 03:51:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by spdbunny 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We tried segregation once before, and I'm pretty sure we all know how well that one worked out.
2006-06-27 03:50:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Not Allie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would be discrimination.
2006-06-27 03:53:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋