Which part would you eat first?
2006-06-26 20:10:24 · 24 answers · asked by St. Dave 5 in Dining Out ➔ Other - Dining Out
Absolutly!
I think it is the right thing to do.
If I died, I would want the others to use my body as food to survive. I feel my body would be contributing to saving lives instead of just laying there rotting. Put my carcus to good use!
Think about it. If you had a friend who would die if they didn't eat the only thing they had? You?
You wouldn't want your friend to die too!
If anybody out there has a problem with my logic, I say "eat me".
2006-06-26 20:14:29 · answer #1 · answered by Molly 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The entire likelihood of the scenario is so overblown by things like the snowed in mountain soccer team disaster of decades ago. It is as if people think that if there is a disaster, the first thing people would do is sort the injured by cutlet variety. The greatest chance of being in a totally foodless clime would be the ocean, and since you wouldn't eat fish because they are salty, would you then defer to the cutlet variety routine? Wouldn't help at all.
2006-06-26 20:18:29 · answer #2 · answered by Pup 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Doing it would depend on two things.
1. Would I have to kill my friend before eating them or would they already be dead?
2.If they werent already dead would we have some sort of agreement and maybe a system to decide who ate and who got eaten?
But basically, yes I would do ANYthing I had to if it was a matter of do it or die.
And I think I'd start with a piece of leg. Thigh meat ought to be pretty good I think.
2006-06-26 20:19:28 · answer #3 · answered by PuppetDog 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well... people say that now, but who knows how their psyches react in those extreme situations. Sometimes your reasoning stops doing its job and instinct is the one in charge.
I probably would eat their flesh if they already died (not killed by me, or not if they asked me not to do it), If i died, I'd encourage my friends to eat me for them to survive (i'm rich in fat, they would have more reserves hahah). I see it as a "body donation", just like the organs.
2006-06-26 20:18:02 · answer #4 · answered by ma_isa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, we'd call it "Cannibal Survivor". Just like the TV show, the group votes to see who gets eaten first. Then it's first come, first serve.
2006-06-27 01:44:55 · answer #5 · answered by HL 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, definitely, just not my kids. I would start with a limb, or just peel off the skin. That's the best part of the chicken, anyway.
2006-06-26 20:14:38 · answer #6 · answered by cocoanutt 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, our ancestors did and it did not always depend on their survival. But i would rather be eaten as a sign of sacrifice to my friends. I just hope they remember what I did for them.
2006-06-26 22:30:28 · answer #7 · answered by animewarlord5000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I would resort to cannibalism. I would eat the *** or breasts first. these areas are easy access, full of protein, and lots of yummy tissue.
2006-06-27 08:03:41 · answer #8 · answered by harp1123 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but that's probably just because I am always the smallest and weakest in my group of friends and I would most likely be the easiest one to take down. ;)
2006-06-26 20:16:35 · answer #9 · answered by Not Allie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Studdenfadden would eat human food, but only the females. Cause eating men is gay.
2006-06-26 20:12:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋