English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Mcdonald's oil...

and your *wink*wink* natural gas

2006-06-26 19:19:13 · answer #1 · answered by crunkmyfunk5 3 · 0 0

May be someday possible; till the world can use the reserves of oil no-one will make public the alternatives even if they already exist.
Imagine what will happened with all economics fields which are producing engines or using the conventional energy.
At short therm a discovery like this can unstable the economy of the entire world, and create tensions maybe even wars.
The viable solution it is relay happened right now, when economic hybrid engines are pouted on caars, and the people become more and more responsible about the environment impact of pollution. Personally I am confident on the future, and I believe the alternatives sources of energy will be used step by step and replace Little by Little the conventional energy.

2006-06-26 19:13:47 · answer #2 · answered by Nicolaie S 2 · 0 0

Hemp, Veg oil. But we don't have to, we aren't really running out of oil.
John Stossel did a report called "are we really running out of oil?" The report concluded that right here in North America in Alberta Canada you will find enough oil to power the world for about 10 billion years. But more oil on the market means prices drop and that's not what the oil companies are about.
Also the oil is mixed in with sand, they say it's a process that takes a bit longer but the oil companies want oil now.

2006-06-26 19:15:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

First, oil isn't in all hazard "sucked". that's unlike there's a swimming pool of oil underground someplace, and we merely jam a straw into the earth to get it out. in addition to, hydrocarbon reservoirs are hundreds of feet under the floor, and could not reason sinkholes because of the fact the oil is "sucked" out. The hydrocarbons are trapped in permeable and porous formations. If the formation happens to includes demanding rock, the hydrocarbons could be bumped off without the risk of formation cave in. If the hydrocarbons are trapped in loosely consolidated formations (like sand), the sand will normally circulate with the hydrocarbons because of the fact the properly is produced. There are various how you are able to decreasing sand production, which helps cut back the quantity of sand it fairly is removed from the formation. One approach secure pumping hundreds of thousands of tiny ceramic balls (proppant) downhole, which stop sand from being produced, yet maintains adequate permeability for hydrocarbons to circulate. As yet another responder suggested, a accepted technique is injection. One hollow is drilled for production, whilst a separate hollow is drilled for injection. Water is an extremely primary injection fluid; as that's pumped into the reservoir, the hydrocarbons are compelled upwards and produced to floor. So, in short, your solutions are: a million. not something 2. Proppant 3. Water

2016-12-08 13:01:39 · answer #4 · answered by holtslander 3 · 0 0

94 million barrels of booze alcohol dragsters right so lets get distilling some booze they won't because you can drink the stuff and put the liquor industry out of business practical.

2006-06-26 19:28:44 · answer #5 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 0 0

Vegetable oil.

2006-06-26 19:04:19 · answer #6 · answered by Will 2 · 0 0

Ethanol from corn and other materials....hydrogen...wind power..solar....

Our goal should be 100% energy independence from those shitbags in the middle east and Hugo Chavez.

2006-06-27 00:02:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

wind power, solar power, hydro power, bio-diesel, mass transit, microwave energy generation, nuclear power, nuclear fusion technology. Coal. Pick one, pick them all. We could impoverish the Middle East with all the choices we have.

2006-06-26 19:10:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's nothing new to make oil from coal.

2006-06-27 00:58:45 · answer #9 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 0 0

The sun, the wind and the atom.

2006-07-03 04:43:17 · answer #10 · answered by jim w 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers