2006-06-26 18:37:21 · 11 answers · asked by Don Prasanga 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
SEE DON,
EVERY BOWLER CHUCKING IN SOME OCCASIONS.
ESP. WHILE THEY ARE FRUSTRATING WITH THE PITCH AND BATSMAN.
BUT,
MURALI IS AFFECTED IN THIS ISSUE, FOR HIGH LIGHT ANOTHER BOWLER.
DO I NEED TO SAY HIS NAME?
2006-06-26 20:08:46 · answer #1 · answered by A.R.RAJA 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NO... Murali has been tested over and over again and he's been proven legal... Had he been an Australian player, he wouldn't be tested even once.. Whenever a bowler shows signs of becoming a classy player, Australia tends to take some action to stop his career.. For example, now people have started to say that Lasith Malinga chucks because he has an action that other players can't tolerate.. When he started to take wickets, all of a sudden he became a chucker for others. But Australians can't point the finger at him because they too had a legandary bowler who had the same action and he praised Lasith Malinga's action. Wonder what could've happened if there wasn't an Australian player who had Lasith's action. Then he would not be playing cricket now.. There's no doubt that Murali is not a chucker.. But I personally think that Harmison and Brett Lee are chuckers. They haven't been tested and won't be tested for sure.. So, I think any bowler chucks to some extent and whether or not he gets tested depends on whether he's Asian or not and whether he's a potential threat to others. Murali has been proven to be legal over and over again... So, there's no doubt that he's not chucking. If someone still says he's a chucker, then he's abnormal... I bet that Budokan guy is not smart, cultured or sophisticated and "civilised" even though he's trying to say that he's civilised..Civilised world knows and accepts the fact that Murali is a legend and those uncivilised people want to believe that Murali is a chucker because that makes them feel so good. That's nothing but their cheap menality and inferiority. Bet he's sooo jelous of him because Murali is one of the players who can make batsmen pee in their pants... Budokan, go get a life.. :-)
2006-06-27 03:44:24 · answer #2 · answered by Teejay 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You bet he is. But it is not his disgrace. His national selectors should not select him if they are truely interested in cricket. The only reason you would select him is if you wanted to win at all costs and cheating was accepteable to you. As a junior he should have been coached properly, and not encouraged to cheat. If, as the team Doctor says, his arm is handicapped, what other international sport has able bodied sport people play along side the handicapped? Especially when the handicap give an unfair advantage. None- they don't and they shouldn't. He seems like a good guy, but if it looks like cheating, smells like cheating and sounds like cheating, well then it is cheating. It dosn't matter how many wickets he ever takes, whilst a hero in the 3rd world sub continent, he will always be a second rate cheat to the civilised world.
2006-06-29 04:32:05 · answer #3 · answered by rusipatel125 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You bet he is. But it is not his disgrace. His national selectors should not select him if they are truely interested in cricket. The only reason you would select him is if you wanted to win at all costs and cheating was accepteable to you. As a junior he should have been coached properly, and not encouraged to cheat. If, as the team Doctor says, his arm is handicapped, what other international sport has able bodied sport people play along side the handicapped? Especially when the handicap give an unfair advantage. None- they don't and they shouldn't. He seems like a good guy, but if it looks like cheating, smells like cheating and sounds like cheating, well then it is cheating. It dosn't matter how many wickets he ever takes, whilst a hero in the 3rd world sub continent, he will always be a second rate cheat to the civilised world.
2006-06-27 02:00:20 · answer #4 · answered by budokan 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
U know what,those who made the rules for ICC are really dumb.
The rules are now changed and 14 degress is now the limit.So, Murli is definitely within the rule.
On the other hand,Shoaib and Lee are genuine chuckers(though,their angles are within the range,too) considering their throwing actions.
Whatever the rules,Murli is such a genius its a treat to watch him bowl (eventhough im a Indian) and u know what cricket is played by the spirit of the game and not by its rules.
2006-06-27 02:28:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
In a way he is ....Docs says his natural arm has a rotation more than a normal human gets....if u look at his action you will see the way he bowls(and if u play cricket) try bowling with that action u cannot do it without throwing and its easy to get more spin and the doosra .....still he is clean by ICC...Good debatable Question by the way
2006-06-27 01:42:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no not at all. because it is evident that he is the one who went more than 3 times to the ICC technical team and attended the
tests . and cleared saying his natural inability to straighten the hand. its not a problem. he noway checker.
and aussies will make all this comments because they are not able to play him. u can see the last series stats when australia visited srilanka.
2006-06-27 02:11:38 · answer #7 · answered by neernar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure is. Most of his balls are chucked but some stand out more than others.
2006-06-27 01:41:05 · answer #8 · answered by Adam H 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yep !!!
big time chucker
2006-06-27 03:24:08 · answer #9 · answered by R. J. 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No he is not
2006-07-03 23:08:41 · answer #10 · answered by Sherlock Holmes 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋