Generally, I think that you are correct. There is a huge problem with getting good answers on here. But, I think that I am slightly more optimistic than you;) I would change the percentages to as follows:
40% of the answers will be a religious person giving you religious advice (which may or may not be nonsense depending on your persuasion)
30% of the 'answers' do not answer your question because the author has not read to the bottom of what you wrote
20% are impossible to understand
10% are good answers that are informative and useful
Of course, these percentages vary on the basis of the complexity of the question- the more complex the question (requiring more than just a facial analysis), the worse the answers get:)
2006-06-26 17:08:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Princess 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't have enough time on my hands to calculate all that, but
if I did - I'm terrible at math and wouldn't get far.
However, I'm not religious - I'm spiritual. There's a difference.
I try not to confuse people, I do express my opinions but try to
encourage not force, and I always think it out the best I can and
I have no clue if it's at all informative because that's all 'relative'.
I'm not good at math, but I can tell the difference between a
glass half-empty and a glass half-full, and I also know that .01%
it pretty darn low for an estimate of general discussion worth.
Didn't you use 2 points to ask this question?
What percentage do I fall into your relative categories with?
Now that you don't like me, I'm probably expounding nonsense -
you don't 'get' what I'm saying or my opinion doesn't matter because your version and my version of facts and/or reality are not the same.
2006-06-27 00:15:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cedar_2006 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, you are not right. Your statistical information is based on anecdotal evidence, was subjectively interpreted, and is - more likely than not - woefully inaccurate with respect to the statistical breakdown.
Put me in the "opinion with no connection to facts or reality" category, but I'll be damned if I admit that it's 19.99%.
Have a nice day :D
2006-06-27 00:06:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by © 2007. Sammy Z. 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that Yahoo Answers was an excellent idea that has been abused by a large number of people. I like to be silly at times and my record shows this. I also have a serious side with intellect. I don't "troll for points" as someone said. Although I think I've seen people do that. I say what I think.
2006-06-27 00:11:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by dhalia_1977 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
sounds right to me. most of the time i get nonsense and maybe three out of 24 answers are actually good. the 60% religious one might be a bit off because the only time i get religious answers is when i ask a religious question. and there is nothing wrong with being religious.
2006-06-27 00:11:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by fairy_dust_xo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you believe that, you must be in the .01% percent tile of the people with less than slightly above average intelligence! Because no one would waste their time and energy asking a question in which only 1 person in 10,000 would give any insight and thought to.
2006-06-27 00:10:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No you're left. Sorry couldn't resist.
I think that you forgot one people just answer nonsense to get points.
Unfortunately I think I usually fall in the 20% range of not being understood.
2006-06-27 00:40:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Red Yeti 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you're a bit off on your numbers:
99%: People trolling for points
0.9%: Unrelated to the question at hand, or making fun of the asker of the question
0.09% : Illegable, excessive use of 'l33t'
0.01%: Useful, and well thought out.
2006-06-27 00:05:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ian M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
For God so loved the world that He sent His Son, so whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. John 3:16
2006-06-27 00:32:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Gabby_Gabby_Purrsalot 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I wouldn't stay at YA, if I thought so. You've been very unlucky here. I usually get lots of useful answers, and only a few useless ones.
2006-06-27 00:05:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋