take a look at this website
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50746
2006-06-26 15:34:56 · 16 answers · asked by n9wff 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Look at them all crying! Poor Bush bashers. HA! HA! HA!
2006-06-26 17:07:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 10⤋
There has been so many lies and so many statements contradicting eachother, I don't know what to believe anymore. How do you know what is said on the website is the truth? Why should the U.S. have nuclear weapons and not others countries? Fair is fair. But our gov't wouldn't like that because then we wouldn't be the most powerful anymore and they enjoy things that way. The way it is right now, we have a lot to loose. Officials in our government even feel threatened when China or Japan does business with North Korea.
The main and possibly the only reason our military is over there is to gain rights to their oil. It's just like a game of chess or something. I don't mean to be disrespectful in saying this. It is not to be taken lightly like a game but in many games like chess, you take out the weakest opponent or piece first. That way that opponent or piece cannot help the others. This first piece would have been Afghanistan. Our gov't also ecouraged and provided ambition for both Iraq and Iran to fight with eachother to weaken them just so we could come in and take over. Our next target sounds like it will be Iran. There are already stories on the news about Iran hiding WMD. But I'm sure we won't go after Iran until we have Iraq under control.
Yes, very much like chess and similar games except we are dealing with human lives. Another interest is to suppress other countries from developing better weapons etc, so we can still have a formidable military. Don't believe everything you hear and read. If Iraq was so dangerous to us as to sanction declaring war on them and also bringing in England and Canada, then why were we able to plow through there and take over the capital within a week? Hmm... they don't sound like much of a threat to me. It sounds like it was overkill. And it sounds like you are doing exactly what our gov't wants you to do, which is to feed into all their made up BS. If we don't have enough people feeding into their BS, we won't have a good size military willing to go over there and sacrife their lives.
2006-06-26 15:57:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your own article discredits you....
One senior Defense Department official told Fox News the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions.
"This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991," the official said, adding the munitions "are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war."
2006-06-26 16:27:34 · answer #3 · answered by rian 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow you are gullible! WMD's were found since 2003!!! You cannot be serious, if they had the evidence bush would have been very public about it. Is it not interesting that it is in a report 3 years later whereby the WMD's cannot be verified to have been in Iraq. What a joke! Thanks for the laugh!!!!!!
PAY ATTENTION don't believe everything you read! Free thinking is all you really have don't let it go to waste.
2006-06-26 16:08:35 · answer #4 · answered by Inquisitive1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am sorry but I dont believe this. There is no way in Hades that Bush or any Republicans would sit on this from 2003 until now. They have been investigated and criticized and would have said something. As they say in life, dont believe everything u see or read; Especially when its not from a reputable source.
2006-06-26 15:41:54 · answer #5 · answered by rockydriver22 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Speak for yourself, wiff, or whatever. If you can't offer any thing to this site, you shouldn't be here. Using this site just for the link is off the wall. You didn't ask a real question Beavis, Butt bush, whatever!
2006-06-26 15:55:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
YEAH did you also know that G. Bush senior gave Iraq WMD to bomb Iran and then Clinton secretly gave WMD to Iran to counter- attack? Are you really that surprised? Osama Bin Ladin had CIA training... How freakin dumb are Americans?
2006-06-26 15:38:50 · answer #7 · answered by Hard Head 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
kind of old news....and not the weapons we went to war for...but, solid proof that the question is not resolved...and that Hussein lied. Apparently, liberals are surprised by this..and the conspiracy theories abound.....the funniest I have heard is that Bush had them planted there....Liberals will never admit Bush was right...it's like kryptonite to Superman.
2006-06-26 15:48:59 · answer #8 · answered by loubean 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what about the Nukes that Saddam was attempting to procure?
2006-06-26 16:12:36 · answer #9 · answered by Andibo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WHY DO NEOCONS KEEP BRING THIS UP WHEN THE WHITEHOUSE HAS ADMITTED THAT THESE WERE NOT THE WMD'S THAT STARTED THE WAR.
2006-06-26 15:52:59 · answer #10 · answered by INBRED TOOTHLESS NEOCONS 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That sites ...fake?
2006-06-26 15:38:26 · answer #11 · answered by Carolina Kitten 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋