I dunno...I found funny because Limbaugh spent most of his professional life denigrating drug users as being subhuman and now is one himself and apparently has been all along. It looks good on him.
Karma's a biatch, ain't it? ;)
2006-06-26 13:31:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by PALADIN 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
He had Viagra, it was prescribed in his doctors name to avoid it becomming common knowledge. This is quite common in the celebrity world, and nothing uncommon. Had it been a narcotic prescription based on his previous incident, I am sure it would have affected his probation, but in this case it is not likely.
Amazing though the reaction to this by liberals. If the FBI goes into a congressmen's office, after getting a warrant, they are invading privacy. If Bush has our spy agencies looking through international financial transactions, it is an invasion of our privacy. If policemen with a valid warrant, forget to knock, it is an invasion of out privacy. But if Rush Limbaugh has his person searched, its not a problem.
You libs are going to have to start being consistant, or all the elections you will see from here on out, will be just like EVERY election since 1994.
2006-07-03 15:22:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by tm_tech32 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First what business is Rush Limbaugh's legal problems of yours? When the President of the United States was caught lying about having sex in the oval office we were told to mind our own business. Second Rush was accused of a crime but there was not enough evidence to convict him so the charges were dropped. As for Ann Coulter you can't compete on issues so you just call her names. Have you even read her book? She brings out some really valid points. I have been saying all along that Liberals wont do point / counter point so they just call names. How childish.
2006-06-26 13:32:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
This time? I find nothing new on this old story? The man had an addiction to a vicodin a prescription pain killer and a zeolous DA tried to prosecute him and he plead a deal. If that makes you not like him don't listen to his stuff. He's an entertainer - nothing more.
But what is new? I just searched the wires and there is nothing new on this?
2006-06-26 13:48:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by netjr 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vicodin
Pronounced: VY-koe-din
Vicodin can be habit-forming. If you take this drug over a long period of time, you can become mentally and physically dependent on it, and you may find the drug no longer works for you at the prescribed dosage.
2006-06-26 13:27:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by gourou 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The better question is "Why do Americans listen to convicted drug users for political commentary?" It's like a priest preaching against child molestation.
2006-07-03 04:13:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by jim w 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rush got caught with this... A second man with the same amount and same perscription got caught and is doing a 30 year sentence for it. Shameful
2006-06-26 14:36:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by okeydokeycroaky 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol. you would nicely ask, yet i imagine no longer. it really is the line in the item that reads, "No narcotics or different painkillers were in the warehouse, he suggested." no narcotics or painkillers? and it wasn't viagra, so what obtainable pastime might want to the fat nazi gasbag have in it? hellava tale. sounds extremely like those boys have some intense professional education. hmm.
2016-11-15 07:28:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You should be ashamed to amuse yourself with the suffering and trials of other people. I hope you never have to deal with addiction.
Other than that, your "question" is trite and derivative, lacks merit and imagination. D+
2006-06-26 13:27:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
OMG - once a crackhead always a crackhead.
Hey Ethan, how come you didn't answer Rob's question.
R U afraid???
2006-06-26 13:51:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Truth 5
·
0⤊
0⤋