Why are you for/against/indifferent to Gay Marriage?

Question

Post rather you're for, against, or indifferent before you elaborate.

Answer 1

I wish I had a nickle for every time I've answered this question in the last few months.

For it.

I'm not fond of the idea of gay marriage. I won't marry my boyfriend even when the government recognizes gay marriages.
I just don't need a piece of paper or a ceremony to validate my love.

I do, however, believe that Equal rights means equal rights. Gay people are getting married. In christian churches and other religious venues all across the land. One state already recognizes gay marriages. A few others are attempting to equalize the situation by granting equal rights under a different name.

When a group of people decide that because of THEIR beliefs and opinions, another group of people can't have the same rights and protections as they do, I have a problem with it.

Discrimination is wrong no matter what reason you want to give for it. Equal rights isn't something gay people made up to annoy straight people. Equal rights was thought of by the founding fathers of our great nation because far too often, when people obtain power and influence, they use it to supress other people. Our founding fathers, understanding human nature, took steps to make sure that doesn't happen here.

I don't want to marry my boyfriend. I want the right to do it, and have the same protections straight people have when they do it.
There is no reason the government should set aside the intent of our founding fathers just because SOME people don't like us.

Answer 2

See, the problem with the "nicely, a brother and sister living co-dependently might want to savor an same advantages" skill that no 2 instantly people have *ever* abused the marriage gadget at the same time as they weren't in a romantic courting. yet a sibling couple doing so would nevertheless be legally "married"; they does no longer then, in turn, be allowed to marry anybody they were easily romantically fascinated in without dissolving that partnership, with all the criminal complications a divorce may reason. I recommend, i assume if a brother/sister pair (or brother/brother or sister/sister, were gay marriage criminal) had to enter right into a lifelong, non-romantic criminal partnership, optimistic, they could conceivably call for they be granted marriage rights. yet such partnerships will be extremely few and far between, as i imagine the social stigma of tense you be allowed to marry your sister would probably suppress that crew. A extra pertinent question will be on the thanks to handle the fashion of contributors in a wedding ceremony. If marriage is spread out from the position it really is now, then there is the question about even if polyamorous unions should be legally known. And if we then prolonged marriage to let, say, 4 contributors, then what about polygamists who sense socially ostracized because they have a 5-way courting? Polygamists and brothers wanting to marry their sisters, besides the undeniable fact that, characterize a tiny, tiny fraction of yankee society. Homosexuals, at the same time as nevertheless a minority, huge type far more advantageous. beginning up marriage to same-sex couples, i trust, is a thanks to provide those romantic pairings an same criminal rights that are at the moment loved through similar partnerships, at the same time as minimizing the change to the overall gadget. optimistic, the "slippery slope" argument can nevertheless be utilized, yet only because beginning up marriage to homosexuals would open up a higher can of worms does no longer mean it isn't a good and correctly component to do.

Answer 3

I believe that the term "marriage" should be kept as a union between a man and a woman. It's been that way for years now and I see no reason to,change it now. I also believe that a gay or lesbian couple should be allowed to enter a "civil union" or whatever you want to call it. It should be exactly the same thing as a marriage and provide the same benefits as such. Just call it something else. Don't need any resolution or amendment. Straight people would be more acceptable of gays and lesbians if they would learn not to throw it in everyones face all the time! When they parade down the street on floats half dressed or completely naked flaunting their sexuality, it can sometimes be hard to swallow for the majority of us who are straight!

Answer 4

I am for gay marriage.
I am a straight, married woman and member of PFLAG. I joined PFLAG (parents families and friends of lesbians and gays) specifically because of what's going on with regards to marriage legislation.
No matter what you believe, the laws of the USA have NOTHING TO DO with your God, some may have their origins based in religion, but it was never the intent of our forefathers to use Christianity as a tool of governance. If we did, then I guess we'd have to go along with what the bible says about killing all disobedient children.
This is a human rights issue, pure and simple. Marriage is a legal contract between two people.
I hope that in 20 years we are ashamed of how the gay and lesbian community has been treated at this point in time.
Opponents of gay marriage say that they are trying to preserve the American family, to "protect" marriage. Marriage in the United States is not sacred and special. Half of all marriages in this nation end in divorce. Of the marriages that don't end, many are loveless and abusive. We sit in front of the TV and watch "Who wants to marry a millionaire" and crap like that. As a straight woman I can marry any guy I want right now, I don't even have to know him for 10 minutes.
Marriage is so totally disposable in this day and age, it's time to stop using the "sanctity of marriage" when it's convenient, as a tool for bigotry.
Gay people getting married isn't going to hurt anybody.

Answer 5

I am for gay marriage.

Is there really a victim in gay marriage? If I go out tomorrow and marry my girlfriend, is it going to cause my next door neighbor physical pain? Will he not be able to get married to his girlfriend because I married mine? Is there a shortage of marriage certificates in this country?

I pay taxes like everyone else. I go to school, so I can get a degree and get a high paying job so that I can pay more taxes. I vote. I will serve jury duty when summoned. I would gladly serve my country and join the armed forces if it were legal. I have the same rights and responsibilities of my heterosexual friends, except they have the freedom to marry.

Answer 6

For. Why not? Because it threatens hetero marriages? How? Because God is against it? Where, exactly, does it say God is against two men or two women getting married? It doesn't say that in the Bible.

People will say, "Yes it does" and they will quote Leviticus. But Leviticus also says, "...you shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed; nor shall you put on a garment made of two different materials." and "...You sahll not round off the hair on your temples or mar the edges of your beard. You shall not make any gashes in your flesh for the dead or tattoo any marks upon you..."

and don't forget, "If a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall be put to death."

People pick and choose what they want to believe is relevent from the Bible.

Answer 7

Against. God did not mean for two people of the same gender to be together. Marriage should be between a man and a woman, period. He made it that way so that the man and woman could procreate and have children. Two people of the same sex cannot do that and it is simply wrong.

Answer 8

AGAINST---Posting this in the 'gay section' is going to give you skewed results. In poll after poll over 70% of americans are against changing marriage to include same sex coupling.

Answer 9

I'm for Marriage Equality, as we like to call it, check out the Human Rights Campaign http://www.hrc.org/ on how you can help get us this birthright that all humankind deserves. My love is no different than yours and yet I can't marry who I love? That's a fool's logic.

Answer 10

I am against the government being involved in any type of marriage license. you see what that has done to America over half all marriage ends in divorce.