2006-06-26 12:26:23 · 15 answers · asked by miss murder 2 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
I didn't love it, because the story was fiction,
but I didn't hate it, because the movie was interesting.
There's a lot of opinions about "Davinci Code", it's really mysterious and we can find it very interesting and a riddle in this fiction.
2006-06-26 12:55:19 · answer #1 · answered by alma_selena 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Neither. I wanted to see the movie because I did not read the book. I like Tom Hanks rocks and Audrey Tutou is one of my favorite foreign actress.
However I want to let you know that the whole Jesus' bloodline theory was proved to be a hoax by the person who started it, and traced the living bloodline to himself. He confessed around year 2000 before he died that he made it up.
There were some legal documents, but they were falsified.
Mary Magdalene was not present at the last supper nor did not DaVinci draw her, debated person is John...and that info is from the early drawings where painter had named all people. Plus his patron was Catholic church, go go figure why he would want to make up something like that.
Jesus was not married, because there is no any evidence in history to point to that direction. If he was married, it would be in the Bible. Marriage is not a bad thing, but Jesus was single.
Constantine did not pick up the books accepted to the Bible. Canon did. A lot before Constantine's time. The books of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were reliable writers, because they were following Jesus, dining with Him, they were eye witnesses to His miracles, and they heard His teachings...So who do you believe, the ones who lived at the time and knew Him, or somebody else hundreds of years later...
I wonder if so much false stuff would have been said about Allah, would it be a Holy War?????
Remember this a fiction book!!!
2006-06-26 19:41:50 · answer #2 · answered by SeeTheLight 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love
2006-06-26 19:31:38 · answer #3 · answered by trptlps 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love.
2006-06-26 19:29:16 · answer #4 · answered by Sophia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hate! it's all lies. When the author first wrote the book, he said it was fiction, but as soon as it became a big hit, he claimed it was real, just to boost his career.
2006-06-26 19:30:14 · answer #5 · answered by slp32 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Although i did not believe it, it was a good movie, gave instresting points behind their thesis that jesus had a bloodline, and overall very good syntax... but the story is fiction.
2006-06-26 19:30:21 · answer #6 · answered by sweet_jemise 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the book was easier to swallow, The movie had some twists in order to make it more polemical and I didn't like that.
2006-06-26 19:31:25 · answer #7 · answered by michael_gdl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ive only read the book so far, and the book was excellent!!!! I cant wait to see the movie.
2006-06-26 19:30:27 · answer #8 · answered by melkin731 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love it. I can tell fact from fiction.
2006-06-26 19:29:58 · answer #9 · answered by thelordparadox 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did not like
2006-06-26 19:30:43 · answer #10 · answered by Lore 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋