English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

he was right all along, its a sad day for democrats.

2006-06-26 11:53:31 · 13 answers · asked by dale098764 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

liberal media doesn't like to report it, but its out there you just have to search for it, liberal media won't put anything out if it makes bush look good.

2006-06-26 11:58:11 · update #1

13 answers

Especially Michael Moore and his false documentary. For those that don't know:

Iraq's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction was not captured by US forces who heroically brought down Saddam Hussein's regime three years ago this week. It vanished before they arrived.
Israeli intelligence reported before the US-led invasion that starting in late summer 2002 Saddam's WMD arsenal was shipped by truck convoy to Syria. Recently, documents seized from Iraq after the fall of the regime were released to the public. Those documents revealed that under the direct command of former Russian prime minister and KGB boss Yevgeny Primakov, Russian Spetnaz forces oversaw the transfer of Iraq's WMD to Syria ahead of the US-led invasion. These reports have been corroborated by Saddam's Air Vice Marshall General Georges Sada.

So rather than being destroyed or secured, Saddam's WMD arsenal was simply moved from one rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations to another rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations.

Of course, American Media will NOT report this, it will prove Bush right, and then they would look stupid.

Michael Moore, thanks:
Friday, 23 June 2006
When News Lies


WHEN NEWS LIES
Media Complicity and The Iraq War


By Danny Schechter, The News Dissector



A new book from Danny Schechter offers an up to date indictment of the role media played in promoting and misreporting the war on Iraq. It is an analysis of how and why the media got it wrong that pinpoints the failures of journalism and the collusion of media companies with the Bush Administration. The author of EMBEDDED: Weapons of Mass Deception (Prometheus 2003), an account of the TV coverage of the US invasion, returns with a more comprehensive, updated and insider look at the media complicity that Schechter argues "made the war possible."



"Most of the anti-war movement focused on the crimes of the Bush Administration ignoring the mainstream media, its far more effective accomplice," says former network producer Danny Schechter (ABC, CNN). "The government orchestrated the war while the media marketed it. You couldn't have one without the other."



WHEN NEWS LIES includes the feature -length DVD of the prize-winning film WMD (Weapons of Mass Deception). The book will also include the complete script as well as a discussion of the challenges of exposing media with media with a documentary. It chronicles the media war fought alongside the military campaign and the struggle to stand up for truth.

Source(s):
Google it:

Saddam, WMD, Spetsnaz

http://www.wmdthefilm.com/mambo/index.ph...

2006-06-26 13:54:48 · answer #1 · answered by Mark W 5 · 0 5

One more time. The WMD found were at least 15yrs old or more/ They were old, rusting containers. Mustard gas probably given to the Iraqi by the US when they were our Allies in the Mid east. (check some news releases from the Regan administration) And again he had NO ties to the Taliban. But they are tied to the Saudis, maybe GWB should have looked there. The pilots of the planes on 9/11 were Saudis not Iraqi. Unfortunately grasping at straws doesn't change things. Read all of the government report before you ask for an apology. If it were true GWB would have called a news conference and shouted it to the whole world. Get real.

2006-06-26 19:34:14 · answer #2 · answered by olderandwiser 4 · 0 0

The WMD's have not been found. There are no ties between Saddam and the Taliban and please get your facts straight.

I know you bush lovers wish this to be true, but sorry, it is not.

But if it makes you feel better, keep looking for them. By the way, you might as well keep looking for Osama Bin Laden. He maybe he's hooked up to a dialysis machine in some cave.

Lastly, no one owes bush an apology. If anyone should apologize it is bush. He's killed thousands of people and our own troops are dying by the hand full and no one, except Cindy Sheehan, has asked for an apology from that idiot (bush).

2006-06-26 20:29:30 · answer #3 · answered by Beachcomber 1 · 0 0

So now FOX NEWS is part of the liberal media, you idiot?

I went to their website and found nothing, NOTHING about Saddam and the Taliban.

Guess Hannity and O' Reilly - WHO would LOVE to make Bush look good--will let the rest of America in on your little secret right before the elections, right froofY??

2006-06-26 19:00:24 · answer #4 · answered by BooYa 2 · 0 0

Sorry to disappoint, but the wmd they found were left over from the Iran/Iraq conflict in 1991. On CNN they reported that they were no longer active OR operational. A better place to look for wmd's would have been, obviously, Korea or Iran.

2006-06-26 19:43:42 · answer #5 · answered by Nancy L 4 · 0 0

Funny, as it turns out Bush's war has now killed more people that saddam ever did regardless of his intent. Its funny watching Saddam on trial for smaller versions of crimes that bush is now committing.
Are you talking about the gas that's so old that David Kay, the lead weapons inspector, says it's 100% useless?

2006-06-26 19:00:39 · answer #6 · answered by Adam H 2 · 0 0

hey im all with you man, but we already knew they had ties to the taliban, and we haven't found the WMDs cause Saddam sent them all to Syria and Iran right before the war.

2006-06-26 19:09:38 · answer #7 · answered by ben s 3 · 0 0

Wow, perhaps Bush should have clarified that he believed Saddam had VIABLE WMD's. It would have made it so much easier for you simpletons to understand.

2006-06-26 21:01:24 · answer #8 · answered by theothermikes 1 · 0 0

Don't hold your breath man. You can spend your live chasing your tail trying to get Liberals to see facts but the sad fact is that their only platform is "HATE BUSH". Facts and thinking are unknown words to Liberals.

2006-06-26 19:38:28 · answer #9 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 0 0

I want proof of your statement.

2006-06-26 18:56:34 · answer #10 · answered by Risika Desaunt 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers