Yes and then complain about them on Welfare in 15 years . How that for hypocrisy's ???
2006-06-26 11:50:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes yes. According to the laws today, it is a personal, private decision for a woman to murder her unborn child. I say why stop at birth? I think a woman should be given a least a year after the birth to see if being a mother is really something she wants to sacrifice so much of her life to.
Poverty and drug addiction are no excuse for murder.
I wonder if the average liberal understands the incredible irony involved with going to a "save the baby seals" protest one day, while going to a "make abortion free and accessible to everyone" rally the next. Is it really any wonder that they can't win an election to save their lives?
2006-06-26 18:58:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by mrknositall 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm trying to adopt 2 children.. And what about you?
Still i don't understand the point of your question. Are you saying that it is better for a baby to be ripped apart violently in the womb than to be born and face hardships in life? I mean that line of questioning seems to be headed that way if we follow your implication out to it's logical conclusion. Kill them all because some of them would have a life that you don't think is pleasant enough for your standards? Could you explain why you would prefer to kill babies of certain minorities? Thats what your advocating isn't it? Well that is exactly whats happening. Klan parenthood has killed off about 1 in 4 blacks in this country. Nobody marches for them except prolife people.
2006-06-26 18:55:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by unicorn 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good point...for all those that insist that every child can be adopted into a loving family home...why havent all of you folks come forward to help with this problem?
Abortion is a personal private choice that should not be the business or concern of others.
2006-06-26 18:47:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Simplystunning 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
More relative morality from the ignoramuses of the left.
That's about as simplistic as saying because liberals don't believe in the death penalty they should take convicted murderers home to live with them instead of them being executed.
BTW - I haven't repented for the 10 million bugs I killed today while walking across my grass either. Please don't tell PETA. I really don't want those pacifist to burn my house down. It's only us humans inside so I know they won't give a sh*t.
2006-06-26 18:49:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by freetyme813 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pie guy. What do you do sit there and try to think of a question dumber than your last? So what you are saying is that if I don't have the ability to take care of crack babies that we should legalize the murder of all unborn babies. You disgust me!
2006-06-26 19:14:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
NONE can't make it on the income we make as it is. 3 kids aren't cheap to raise on ONE income!!! Let alone trying to add another one!
Maybe the Brad Pitt's & Angelina Jolie's of this world can fix that problem. They have more assets at their access than what NORMAL everyday people do.
2006-06-26 18:48:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by jennifersuem 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I make it a point to only try and adopt unwanted smokin hot 18-20 year old chicks. My room's full. Thanks though.
2006-06-26 18:45:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are willing to abort your child's life, you should abort your own to even things out
2006-06-26 18:46:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
im guessing none. its like when religious people convert people. once they beleive they "saved" then they want absolutely nothing to do with them.
hilarious really.
2006-06-26 18:49:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by johnny_zondo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋