Do you think Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have changed the face of philanthropy?

Answer 1

Are you refering to the massive amounts of money being poured into the foundation that Gates and his wife started up? And the Billions that Buffet is going to eventually be adding?

I think it is up to what becomes of the money/recources that are avalible. I think that they are changinge the way that orgs like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are able to go about their buisness. But I think that other lasting changes really depend on the actions that they choose to take and the results that come of them. Digg this story! Its interesting!

Answer 2

No, in the early 1900's the robber barron did much the same thing - think Carnige, Rockafeller, etc. Also, there are other million and billionares (Paul Newman for instance) who manage to give away their money without nearly as much publicity. Just because Gates and Buffett had to make a big splash doesn't mean they've made a big change.

Answer 3

No, I will! I'm going to set up an online charity that works like a reality tv show/ blog where people donate and then vote where the money goes. It makes more sense and lets people finally trust in a charity. I think most charities suck because you never get to see where your money goes or what's happening. With an online site like itsjustcompassion.com we'll be able to help everyone who needs it because everyone could pitch in and see it work. even if everyone online just gave a dollar we could solve world hunger and homelessness and make education free. Wait for it! Bill Gates is outstanding for his efforts, he just needs to work on the biggest problems first, our basic needs like food and shelter. The rest can be improved after those, he should also use his money to start up a medical research center so we could work on preventing cancer and curing aids and other viruses. there's no reason they should still be problems when there are people with billions of dollars and doctors going broke trying to raise money for research. People just need to fix their priorities!

Answer 4

on the interest of the first 2 people warren buffet and bill gates, I doubt they gave money to charities etc. because they're atheists, and their fulfillment global isn't in preserving with them being atheists, so it really is secure to anticipate they'd do an same regardless of their religious perspectives. Richard Dawkins on the different hand has change into able through writing books on why he doesnt imagine God exists, so the middle of his wealth and philantropy will be him being an atheist so in that social gathering the philantropy does no longer exist, so in that difficulty it really is a good component, besides the undeniable fact that the single component that I dislike with dawkins (do not get me incorrect he's an smart guy and a good scientist, and thus far as his arguments adverse to the existence of God bypass they're good arguments, at the same time as collectively in uncomplicated phrases being relative yet as is an same with all arguments concerning the existence of God.), the component I dislike is his overwhelming conceitedness in that he grants info that besides the very undeniable actuality that good isn't conclusive in besides the existence of God is an unknown we cant be optimistic as there are tremendous arguments on both section, so what I dislike is the very actuality dawkins then is going onto say that there deffinetly isnt a God it is a ludacrous statement to make, putting forward you dont imagine there's a God is effective because its real, yet to assert there deffinetly isnt is innacurate because no one, a minimum of no living individual can no for optimistic. i'm no longer having a bypass at atheists through any skill (i understand theists are only as companies if no extra to be able to assert there deffinetly is a God) yet you won't be able to use deffinitive phrases at the same time as speaking about Gods existence because no individual knows. And the single component that does trojan horse me about the charities of assorted those people is that it isnt annonymous which skill component to them needs popularity for what they did which exhibits their in uncomplicated phrases objective isn't in helping people and in addition they had to study nicely finished to ding something good.

Answer 5

No because Gates gives nothing in the US only overseas. He gives nothing to the country that made him wealthy. Also Warren will be giving his money through Gates which means no one here will see that either.

It is good they give but it really could be used here for a lot.

Answer 6

Maybe that's a question for a different bunch of people. I just had an IQ test and it's 141, but I'm not even sure what that question means, nor do I care!? Sorry, I suppose lots of people do, but I just wanna have fun here. But, my dumba-- thanks you for the ever important POINTS!

Answer 7

I don't know they are still sitting over billions! I mean more than some "Third world" countries would need to be developed countries.

Answer 8

I think these guys are God: They have what it takes to change the world.

Answer 9

If they are truely giving their money to help the world, bless their hearts!

Answer 10

No, they are pouring a bucket of water into a desert.