Hairy backs on men or Hairy legs on women ??
Explain why for the 10 points!
2006-06-26 11:23:50 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Hairy backs on men. It's black, thick, and DISGUSTING. And all they can do is wax...and it grows back. When you hug them...ugh. But with hairy legs on women, it's just less gross. And it's usually thinner and lighter. Plus they can just shave regularly, and then all is well.
2006-06-26 11:28:27 · answer #1 · answered by Susie 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well I think they are both pretty gross. But the hairy legs on a woman is worse. It shows laziness and obvious not caring about yourself or what other people have to look at. It only takes about 5 Min's to shave, even if you didn't wanna do that there is waxing!!! So there is no excuse why any descent self respecting woman would walk around looking like a man!
2006-06-26 11:40:23 · answer #2 · answered by Mom of 2 Great Girls 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hairy legs on women is worse because the hairy back is easier to hide in the summer.
2006-06-26 11:25:30 · answer #3 · answered by la jirafa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hairy backs, at least with hairy legs you can shave without going through a painful procedure. If men wax their back, it might bleed.
2006-06-26 16:19:39 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't grow hair on my legs so I have to say hairy backs on men
2006-06-26 11:27:42 · answer #5 · answered by proud of it 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well im a man so hairy backs on guys dont bother me, it would have to be hairy legs on a girl, but hairy armpits on a girl is way worse
2006-06-26 11:25:53 · answer #6 · answered by beerz24_7 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It really depends on how much hair we're talking here.
If we're talking legs as hairy as mine, than definitely the woman's legs are worse. I should be able to run my hand down her leg and be able to feel the skin, not just the hair.
If its just a little stubble, then the back is worse. It's just disgusting, and I can't imagine having a hairy back in the summer. Sweating would just make it feel disgusting.
2006-06-26 11:29:54 · answer #7 · answered by Ian M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hairy legs on women
2006-06-26 11:25:55 · answer #8 · answered by MelC 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hairy legs on women
2006-06-26 11:25:47 · answer #9 · answered by this old loser 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hairy legs on women because everyone is used to seeing hairy men but hardly ever hairy legs on women*yuck* lol.....so there u go
2006-06-26 11:29:50 · answer #10 · answered by ♥SarahLuvsYoohFoo♥ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both have a high gross coefficient. But, backs can be hidden under a shirt easily.
You might say legs can also be hidden, but I say: some years ago, in Japan (where they import a lot of culture, but often get it wrong), I would often see women wearing pantyhose over totally unshaven legs; shaving wasn't in their culture, and yet they wanted to be fashionable and wear hose.
I am *JUST NOW* getting over the nausea.
Therefore, I say that hairy legs on a woman are far worse...and, I'm a woman, myself!
2006-06-26 11:28:51 · answer #11 · answered by silvercomet 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋