English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you think today's outbursts calling for censorship of the media, for example, just continue to show how badly they want dictatorial control of this country?

2006-06-26 09:49:24 · 14 answers · asked by you_should_oughta_rethink_that 3 in Politics & Government Government

14 answers

President Bush a fascist? The answer is ABSOLUTELY! Bush and his staff are "cloaked" Nazis wrapped up in the American flag!...they "preach" patriotism, but it is "blind patriotism"...Hitler did the same thing with the Nazi party when 3 million worker were unemployed in the streets...Hitler told the German people that the Jews caused unemployment and starvation...Bush used the Muslim world as his whipping post...now every Arab, including honest citizens living in America have to watch over their backs....the tragedy of 911 was an excuse for Bush to ride in like a hero, like Hitler once did with fascism, to save the day like a modern day John Wayne...unfortunately, this is one make-believe cowboy the world could do without!

2006-06-26 12:27:51 · answer #1 · answered by WORD UP G 1 · 1 0

Why is it that the US PR machines nazifies everyone they hates ?

American journalist and professor Paul Street raised this question on the Z community's blogs, please read his post and the comments attached and tell me if you find his post informative..it shows that we are now facing new form of fascims , and that this fascims took origin when Us corporation sponsored european fascims ( Hitler and Mussolini) during the 30 to slow down socilaist ideology.

http://blogs.zmag.org/node/2600#comment

Also do you think that America is too patriotic given the number of
unreflected and unsensitive answers people are giving to the barbary and misery inflicted upon the Iraqis people ?
Is this possible that some americans were rendered unsensitive, numb, and socially irresponsible , is it possible that some americans feel that when there is political dissent to the policies of the government feel that america is being threatened? is it possible that some american react the same way as they were pre-programmed by their TVs and Movie industry propaganda by displaying an appearance of violence?
Is this possible that The US propaganda is aimed at making the US people believe thay are some sort of HEROES or Santa CLAUS
liberating nations

a few thinker think that fascims has evolved


Facism, as per state and industry
Submitted by Anonymous on Sat, 2006-06-24 11:47.

It does not describe the US system. Facism does not correspond to the petro-industrial-informational-military system of commerce. Facism, ( in one state ), is a much smaller phenomenon. A developing child, so to speak, when compared with this mother. A few of the crudely efficient methods of facism are discarded as well.
» reply
Cancerous
Submitted by Victor on Sat, 2006-06-24 13:57.

Perhaps cancerous is a better term. The Corporate State is a cancer upon government, human civilisation and the world environment. It cannot stop itself from spreading and it cannot be stopped by others short of excisement. Which is precisely what should be done about it.
» reply
Western minimal democracies cont'd
Submitted by Anonymous on Sun, 2006-06-25 12:42.

Posted by Kelvin Yearwood:

Just to add a further perspective on this excellent blog from the US pillion passenger on the road to terrorist state rogueism, the new conservative leader charming the UK press at the moment, Cameron, has stated that he would cut the UK's obligation to the Human Rights Act when he comes to power, and replace it with a B ill of Rights, a Human Rights Act with 'common sense'. In other words, there would be loopholes whenever US/uk foreign policiy demanded it.

Consequently, we will be faced at the next election by the possible choice (where choice actually counts) between a rogue terrorist government (possibly led by Gordon Brown); the scurge of human rights, Cameron; or a Lib-Dem party which, to their great credit, did, under Kennedy, oppose the Iraq war, but have gone curiously silent on the issue since their leadership changed. Non of these parties oppose global corporate power, of course; they just disagree, minimally, on how that power is expressed.

What Westminster, Whitehall and British intelligence continue to know is the lesson that has long been passed onto the US elite agencies, that pro-business interests fascism is a good thing, forcibly curbing domestic human rights and demands, all for the benefit of capital. Ideally, of course, as much of this culture of fascism as is possible is expressed at home as well. An intelligent and universal perception of the Human Rights Act in the UK isn't the point; let's get rid of it and debunk it in the press as not British and quite 'common sense'.

2006-06-26 12:21:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

lol Just what a Muslim extremist might say.
They know the New York Times is covered under freedom of the press and are for the freedom of the press your a spinning liberal doing your country a dis-service. It is the person who leaked the info responsible for the treason. As for the NY Times? If Americans continue their subscriptions to them it will be at the cost of American lives here and abroad shame on them.
John McCain for president in 2008

2006-06-26 09:58:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No one who knows what "fascist" means, or who knows that Bush and Cheney are not guilty of what you are accusing them of; its the liberals who are bent on seizing your personal liberties. MTV News is not a good source for information.

Try these, they assume you have a brain and can make up your own mind:

2006-06-26 09:58:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Republicans are the worst. All you need to do is look who the infamous smear meisters Lee Atwater and Karl Rove labored for and look at a number of their dirty ploys and plots to understand who has the take no prisoners body of innovations to politics. Rush Limbaugh is likewise a Republican and he received his repute through doing such issues as calling Chelsea Clinton the White abode canines at the same time as she become 12 years previous. thus far because the persons you factor out, who all Republicans, all of them deserved a smear, no longer in uncomplicated phrases are they public figures yet maximum of them were corrupt, crooks, and liars. that's of direction a biased question and also you're looking for a biased answer. i grants you one yet no longer the single you search for.

2016-11-15 07:12:28 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Not at all. I consider the politically correct Democommies to be fascists.

2006-06-26 10:11:26 · answer #6 · answered by shakeragroad_2000 4 · 0 0

Yes I believe they are. For the mentally challenged NEOCONS, I've included a link for the definition of fascism.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fascism

2006-06-26 09:56:15 · answer #7 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 5 · 0 0

The liberal media should be censored. Idiots always believe what the Times says.

2006-06-26 09:53:10 · answer #8 · answered by sherry 2 · 0 0

I consider Cheney to be a corporatist, and Bush to be his dancing monkey.

2006-06-26 10:24:22 · answer #9 · answered by BarronVonUnderbeiht 3 · 0 0

whatever. you need to re-read the definition of a facist. I am so tired of the bad definitions spurred by empty rhetoric and ignorance of the definition of words.

2006-06-26 09:53:43 · answer #10 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers