pro abortion? Y not kill the child at one yr old? or 2 or 5?

Question

Why protect a child at all? the end reason (after all pretense is peeled away) is ALWAYS that the child will inconvenience the mother.
Well say the child becomes an inconvenience after a year or two. why not kill the child then?
A large 'reason' that pro abortionist use is that the unborn child is not fully formed. Neither is a one year old. in fact no one is! We all go through formative changes as long as we live. It is a scientific fact, therefore why not kill a 5 yr old? The answer, ultimately comes down to location (location, location, location).
Preemies live as small as 4 months after conception so viability is not an arguement either.
Why can't people ("pro-choice' advocates) see that when each and ever arguement they use is extemded, is self destructs?

Answer 1

Killing children who've already been born -- be careful. Don't give the pro-death side any ideas!

You're absolutely right with your "where do we draw the line" argument. And the pro-abortion side is losing the argument more and more as time goes on.

Their argument is becoming more ludicrous, with the improvements in neonatal technology that clearly show a HUMAN life in the womb from the very earliest stages of pregnancy.

There's NO way that a bunch of guys in black robes would have issued the Roe v. Wade decision, if they'd had access to today's neonatal technology. There's no way they could have justified it.

Answer 2

not everyone who is pro-choice is pro abortion me for example i am against abortion, yet i believe the option to have one needs to be there. What if someone is raped? Imagine some 14 yearold is abducted. she is raped. Though she is found by the police and brought home it is too late to take the morning after pill. The girl finds out she is pregnant. Her childhood ended. She now has to make a choice whether to give birth to a child who most likely will have difficulties in life because her mother was young and small so the baby most likely will be too, and then either keep it and have a constant reminder of her rape, or give it up for adoption and have to part with her baby. Or have an abortion. It already would be a hard decision for her. But what if she didnt have a choice. And abortions were illegal. i think u see my point.

Answer 3

Stupid Question. Because at One, Two and so on the baby is aware of it's existence. Think about it. Do you remember when you were inside your mother womb. Your consciences doesn't get activated until your born. When all your senses come to life. And I believe in abortion before the brain is developed. If the fetus brain is developed and you decide to have an abortion then it's too late. Have the kid and put it up for adoptions. You shouldn't have to wait that long to know if your knocked up. Especially with all the home testing kits. If your having sex with out a condom, buy a kit and test yourself. The kit is a lot cheaper then the abortion.

Answer 4

My be there wouldn't be as many abortions if THE MEN WOULD STEP UP TO THE PLATE!!! God it is always the women that are criticized, well it takes two to tango. he needs to take more responsible too. Get a life and stop putting all the blame on the women.

And no we wont kill the 2 and three yr. old we will just sent them over to you. See how you like it. and a fetus is only a potential life...it is only until the head and shoulders are out that it is considered a true life.

Answer 5

some cultures/tribes eat their children... to be pro-life... animals will eat their children if its better for their children... this all being beside the point...

lets use a larger human culture as an example... japans over population... illegal children... are not killed in the womb or killed intentionally... they're put into orphanages.. that are pretty much dark damp prisons,, where they're scantly fed,, have no emotional connections.. and slowly die from a true lack of love.. now.. for some reason.. that is more humane that killing an unborn baby.. course in america,, we'd rather see kids be raised as orphans,, emotionally detached from nearly everyone they meet cuz there's usually no steady connection w/ anyone during their toddler years.. and why not says the govt; they make better workers & consumers that way!

Answer 6

We must protect children. And one of the things we must protect them from is illogical thought such as you outline in your question. I could go on for an hour explaining the difference between a child and a fetus. (Read Roe v Wade) But you would never understand. For example, I can explain cosmology to my dog but he just doesn't get it. And you will never understand the difference in a fetus and a child.

Abortions usually occur after much thought. Sometimes they occur after praying to God. And sometimes they occur without thought or reason. When a person prays to God about abortion, I seriously believe that they do not bring into the picture inconvenience of the Mother. And for you to say that is Always the case is not only a lie, it is cruel and a Sin. I would guess it is perhaps one of the worst sins I can imagine. You will surly burn in hell. When you use your power to speak to destroy a person's relationship with God, you are being an Anti-Christ.
You have a twisted mind to compare a Child to a fetus. And to suggest killing Children is also cruel and sick.
And the rest of your arguments fail to any logical person. God himself uses abortion in the form of miscarriage. Is God a killer of Children? Are you smarter than God? Do you reason better than God?
Your questions are obviously from a person that is not capable of understanding abortion without absurd situations. So I will ask you a question similar to the ones you ask. If a million little children were on a ship. And the ship was about to sink unless one were thrown overboard. Would you throw the child over, or would you allow the 1 million to die?
And for every foolish situation you can concoct, I can concoct just as foolish a situation to counteract your argument.
Please let’s continue the conversation, but try to use valid argument.
Why can't pro life anti-Christ people see that all their arguments fail to reasonable people? Only an anti-Christ or devil worshiper would want to take away the Free Will God has given and the access to Prayer for moral decisions that was given to us by God. Why do they want to force their evil ways on God loving people.
I guess that the examples set by God himself in his use of miscarriage, the fact that the bible encourages abortion, the fact that God gave all people free will and the fact we were given minds to reason do not enter into the picture of the "pro life anti God" group.
.

Answer 7

Please remember to try to see things from all sides. There are rape victims, incest victims who would rather have an abortion than to bring a child conceived in hate into the world. Try to keep an open mind. Pray for those who feel they don't have choices, and try harder to stay anger so that you don't fall into condemning someone. Love your neighbor as you love yourself. Channel that anger and use it to spread a positive word about life. God bless you.

Jai

Answer 8

Tell you what, why don't you become a young woman with no means to support herself and then get knocked up and ask God to give a hundred thousand dollars which is about what it costs to raise a child. I doubt he'll write you a cheque.

Answer 9

Simple. A 1 year old.... 2 year old... etc are not physically attached to the body of someone else.
I suggest you worry about your own matters rather than what goes on in the uteruses of women you will never meet. You have issues.

Answer 10

i think its because the child doesnt have fealings yet.but i think u should think about your problems cause i think if someone gets raped or something& shes 14 & cant support a child orhandle 9 months it will be use full 2 have an abortion