How do you account for the 9-11 attack on the WTC, when owner Silverstien gave order to "pull" building 7.

Question

I caught an interview with, the owner of building seven, Larry Silverstein, where he said, he gave the order to "pull it" reffering to building seven. I know he has since denied he meant to demolish it, but he has not otherwise provided an alternative rational explanation to what he ment by "Pull it".

Further, there was no jet plane impact to weeken the building, no hot fuel to melt the steel, but it still went down like a controlled demolition. In Short, no wiggle room.

Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges: See web page below.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/050106silversteinanswers.htm

Answer 1

I worked in building 7. It burned up from the heat and the collapse
of one and two. The whole area was wrecked, even buildings(like Myrill Lynch) where ruined, and it was blocks away, not connected by the path and the underground mall like 7 was.
7 collapsed just the way it was built to, like all towers in populated areas are. Spin down not fall over.

Answer 2

You won't get any real responses. Most of the people who agree with you are tired of answering these same questions over and over again. People will call you stupid and all that stuff but those are the people who really don't want to try and figure stuff out on their own. They accept the governments answer and just repeat it. But I agree it is very weird that the building collapsed, almost intentional:) I wonder what companies were in that building.......and I agree nothing hit it, and there is no way a fire brought that building down in that uniform of fashion. If you can't see that then you are blind, an a lot of people are.

Answer 3

If Silverstein actually meant that he gave the order to pull down the building, why the hell would he say that on national television? Is he some kind of special moron? That just doesn't make any sense. Rather, when he said "pull it," he was clearly talking about pulling out the firemen who were in the building.

Answer 4

Please get a life. When the N and S. towers collapsed it weakened the foundations of any building close by. This building was doomed. Not to mention heat and fire as mentioned already.

Answer 5

There are many conspiracy theories,but this one has more than an element of truth.The way the tower crashed was like a controlled explosion of a chimney.Have you seen this site?
http://www.glennbeck.com/news/05172002.shtml

Answer 6

obviously he had his reasons as he would not give that order,
because he knows that if it weould have been a 'bad call' there would have been an investigation

if you are not on the inside (meaning work there and know all the deteails) you really shouldnt judge others

Answer 7

Next you will be telling us that the people who did this are also behind the JFK assassination as well as the unexplained alien landing in Arizona.

Answer 8

I account for it by the fact that dumb people would rather believe a complicated conspiracy than the truth

Answer 9

You are a moron

end of explanation

Answer 10

True.One jew said to another.."When did your factory burn down?".The other replied.."Next week".