I agree with you. On my way to work every day, I stop at a mini mart to get a morning paper and a Dr. Pepper. And every day, at 11am, there's guys-big strong strapping your fellows, buying their 40's and drinking them behind the store. What kind of person is already drinking at 11am on a Monday?
When my hubby and I first got married, we ate PB&J on white bread and vienna sausages most days. I had a weekly grocery allowence of $50.00 for two people and two cats. One day while buying mac & cheese, I was behind two women buying ten live maine lobsters...with food stamps. You wanna talk about some body getting pissed off!?! I don't know who was more angry, the cashier or me.
And for the record...my hubbs and I are not min wage earners. He is an electrician, I am a disc jockey. We work. Every one should. Even those with disabilities have SOME ability to contribute something.
Welfare sucks.
2006-06-26 08:53:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by kelly24592 5
·
5⤊
4⤋
The government sometimes pays to help people survive when they are unable to work, but it has nothing to do with thier ability to watch television. Even people in hospitals can watch TV although most of them cannot work!
If you work at Walmart and have a family, you're probably not paying very much into taxes to begin with so stop your bitching.
Things are better than you think. You will probably be very, very happy to find out that there are a lot of people in this country who don't get enough government help to stay in housing OR BUY A TELEVISION! They are homeless and many of them suffer and die from lack of proper medical and mental health care.
So when those imaginary freeloaders you talk about make you upset, you should take comfort in the knowledge that there are real people and families out there, many of them Mexican, who are homeless and suffering! Isn't that GREAT! I hope that makes you feel better. Have a great day!
PS: The iraq war is costing 2 billion dollars per week. How many welfare checks is that?
2006-06-26 08:50:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why would you watch TV all day..? tell you what.. TV is a giant commercial. Programmers give you some program to keep you entertained until the next commercial, only golf is different... Golf make you sleep til next commercial...news are entertainment news and not real news. Real news also are not real news neither; these are just make believe news or stories the government wants you to believe..
Most of the TV content is designed to make you believe that you are an heroic consumer that does consent to every little bullshit government want you to believe or buy, it makes you buy stuff you dont want nor that ever gonna make you happy..
Worst it the government and corporation are able to make you spend thousands of beautiful $$$ on high definition and bran NEW TV,, cable and the satellite communications.. so you pay for the B-U-L-L-SH-It they feed you with.. And so MADAME, among the B-U-L-L-SH-It they feed you with" is to blame the illegals mexicans" , and while you are whinning at illegals you are not paying attention to the real causes of spending..and you are not Whining IN FRONT of your Government
Also the mexican illegals you are whinning about are caused because you did not opposes NAFTA and the corporations that made the poor poorer ie you and the US government created these poors.. thus Nothing of which would had happened if you did spend or loose your time in front OF YOUR BELOVED TV in the first instance, you should had make sure you blocked NAFTA instead when the question of NAFTA was the issue..
Also corporate fraud cost you more than illegals, so why dont you take on the rich for a change? nooo you got to pick on mexicans..
The governement says: OH MY GOD ! there look ! there is an illegal Mexican eating a potatoe chip he found on the floor!, its costing money. and you, you are so enshrined in your Make Belief Bu_ _sh_it that you would to go get the potato chip from his mouth.!
2006-06-26 08:47:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, cause now, Argentina has the best economic situation EVAH! Here's the thing, buddy. You bust your butt at wal-mart while someone richer than you pays part of their paycheck for the privilege of subsidizing your taxes so that you don't have to shell out fifteen grand every year. And you know what they're saying when they do it? They're saying "Stupid minimum wage idiot. Why should I have to shell out my money just to cut this lazy guy who couldn't even get an office job a break."
Yeah, sounds just as bad when you say it...
2006-06-26 08:40:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Miss Red 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
it quite is a few thing that has been around when you consider that Johnson who initiated welfare. We paid for human beings to sit down down domicile and convey infants...for each baby produced the verify grew to become into extra advantageous and the circle went on. no longer purely did we pay for each thing we additionally geared up new housing each 20 years after it grew to become into destroyed by employing the human beings we've been helping. whilst the government pronounced..."oh seem, possibly we'd desire to constantly make those human beings artwork" the government initiated a software to coach those people who have been on welfare with the aid of civil provider artwork. the learning positions grew to become into complete time jobs with advantages, and the human beings who took civil provider tests have been denied the prospect for civil provider jobs and compelled to artwork interior the mainstream the place pay grew to become into much less, advantages have been few and opposition grew to become into fierce. 30 years later the welfare human beings have pensions equaling 3 to 4 thousand funds a month, scientific, dental and Lexus' and the guy working puzzling 40 hours each week is dropping his benny's, downsized pensions and volatile 401K's...pass discern! you have a precise to *****, now get available and elect the little one-kisser who can help rather of the single that has a good BS badge
2016-12-09 01:56:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with you. My uncle lives off Welfare, and is perfectly capable of working. He's just lazy.
I think Welfare should be limited to those who cannot work, due to serious physical and/or mental deformities, those who do work, but make below a certain income, and those who have lost their job through no fault of their own (for a time period of six months to one year).
Women with children will not get free education anymore, or be taken care of. I know a girl I used to go to school with who got pregnant just so she could get free schooling. Not right for others who have to pay for school, and not good for the child, since she doesn't know who the father is (she wanted to get pregnant, so she slept with about 20 guys just to make sure she did get pregnant).
I know it may seem harsh, but I think it will give people an incentive to get a job, since those who do work but still don't make above a certain income will get compensation, and those who don't work get nothing. It's only fair, and it will benefit society.
2006-06-26 08:42:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by rliedtky 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
it depends. if they are just too lazy and sit around all day long watching tv they shouldnt get payed by the government. but if they are physically disabled then they should get payed because its not their fault they are like that.
2006-06-26 08:42:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by xxheavenzsentxx 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think you're being a bit paranoid. It's not quite that simple.
2006-06-26 08:37:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by scott j 3
·
1⤊
0⤋