I have studied up on the loose change videos quite thouroughly. I rather enjoy watching them, and I believe that it is the tip of the iceberg to a whole slew of other questions that need to be answered. Why would the media not look into the topics? They probably have, but just like any other country our media is controlled by the government and they monitor every part of the media. One huge word comes to mind. Treason. It would be in the governments mind, but my friend, you know the facts, dig deeper and take a stance. Inform others around you. Go to wikipedia, i encourage you to start looking into government connections with the free masons, skull and bones, illuminati.
I believe that you will find interesting things. Don't take my word for anything, do some exploring, you will enjoy it, I am sure.
2006-06-26 07:26:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by pacifistic_mentality 1
·
0⤊
4⤋
I also found the video interesting. I don't think any of the news channels will comment or look into any of the topics/discrepancies addressed because then they would have to answer a lot of tough questions. I mean, how would the media explain what happened over PA, especially considering what Loose Change mentioned about there being no debris as in other crashes? I've done some work in journalism, and there's no way anything questioning what the government has stated will be crossed, especially something as tragic as the events of 9/11. But until someone addresses the topics mentioned in the video, I'll remain skeptical.
2006-06-26 14:19:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Neo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Simple answer: The theory cannot stand up to the facts. Some common sense and some research into things that are true should get you thinking in the right direction. Why are you letting a filmmaker tell you what you saw on that day? Someone please make a valid point. No official report corroborates claims made by the video. Be careful how you use the word "documentary." Many of the "facts", claims, and sources are misquoted, quoted out of context, false, uncorroborated witness reports, and just ignorant. Please do more research on your own instead of believing one film. Then make up your own mind.
2006-06-27 13:34:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by djollie111 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they won't get invited to any more Whitehouse press conferences, and not toeing the line by the Republican party's Fox News would make that news source instant pariahs in the news world. You also forget that almost EVERY major news source, from magazines to newspapers to every major news station is owned by just a handful of corporations now since the deregulation under Bush Sr. There IS NO INDEPENDENT MEDIA.
The only bad news, the "liberal press", we get is when the news gets so bad they would look like idiots NOT to report it, but if it can be spun in favor of Bush and company, it will be.
2006-06-26 14:58:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by lostinromania 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let me answer your question with another question. If there was anything to this "documentary" video, why wouldn't the anti-Bush media be all over it like white on rice?
As for CNN and Fox News, they aren't likely to give any credibility to these topics by covering them.
2006-06-26 14:23:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Radio Spy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good movie and valid points you should look at this website. It really brings an interesting view of 9/11 and the Novous Ordo Seclorum.......
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/13_33_freemason_sig.htm
2006-06-26 14:33:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
CNN and FOX are owned by the same interests that are making millions off this "war on terror".
2006-06-28 00:49:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by atarmiga 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
probably because the video itself is questionable
there are scores of conspiracy videos, if you look hard enough you will find more, but many are bogus or contain some exaggerated opinions
2006-06-27 08:49:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
with Bush in office?R u kidding?
2006-06-26 14:16:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Wiseguy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably because they don't dabble in conspiracy theories.
2006-06-26 14:50:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by kathy059 6
·
0⤊
0⤋