Clinton was a genius compared to GW. He left his Presidency with such a high surplus....and Bush has pissed it all away + spent so much that your grandkids are going to pay for it....
$500 TRILLION in Iraq....who's paying for it?
2006-06-26 07:32:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
4⤋
It's because they have nothing else. And, btw, the Ted Kennedy drinking stuff is even older than the Clinton/Monica stuff.
My feeling is they can't really defend Bush and know the liberals are pretty much right about him, so all they can do is attack a guy who hasn't been President for over five years now. How pathetic is this argument: "Well, he's better than Clinton!" That's all ya got??
2006-06-26 06:34:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
if they can remind Americans about a mistake President Clinton made that really was no ones business maybe they won't think about the mistakes President George W Bush is making every day one after another that is hurting our Great Country. When you can't get it right blame others
2006-06-26 06:31:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by trish 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because that's the only thing anyone will remember him by. He never had any great strokes of genius or accomplished anything important. It will always be Clinton and Monica.
2006-06-26 06:43:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Really? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They need to find some fault with the democratic party... and this is pretty much the big sha-bang.
And again... yes Clinton lied but nobody DIED when Clinton lied.
2006-06-26 06:41:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's easier to talk bullshit than to take responsibility. They can't get over Bush's incompetence, so they mask it with (gasp) an adulterer. At least Clinton focused on the issues instead of striking at the homos when his brain stopped working.
2006-06-26 07:48:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Huey Freeman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
you've were given to be kidding, properly? you're speaking about an same guy who bombed an Iraqian aspirin production unit to position off the hearings? i imagine Clinton become too inept to take Osama at the same time as he become presented to him. does no longer that were extra valuable as a diversionairy tactic?
2016-11-15 06:58:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well since repubs have run our country into the ground and gore is just too easy of a target, they have to fall back on old reliable bill clinton!!! not that dems are much better...but jesus, isn't it time for a full-time third party in the US???
2006-06-26 06:27:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
She was not the real issue.
Lying about it to a Grand Jury was the real issue.
As for "other things" ? Too numerous to list, having lived in Arkansas during his Governorship.
Ever heard of Mena, AR.? I doubt any evidence exists.
2006-06-26 06:33:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by ed 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because during the time he was getting blow jobs, the Sudanese(?) government offered to turn OBL over to us and he turned them down. Great priorities.
****************************************************
Edit -
Hey! Great Personal Response from Michelle:
"From: Michelle
Subject: What's wrong with you DILDO?" end of message
Seriously - how does this even equate to what I said? Like most Democrats, Michelle doesn't care that Clinton could have prevented 9/11.
2006-06-26 06:53:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by dlil 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are still trying to deflect the blame for all their mistakes, so they bring up non-issues (like the Clinton thing).
2006-06-26 06:30:12
·
answer #11
·
answered by bored in Michigan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋