2006-06-26 05:05:23 · 17 answers · asked by glassman 1 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Heck no-he was Innocent and he and Robert Blake will search diligently for the rest of their lives for the real killers...
Oh, and for all you black people that think OJ was a black man who got one over on "the man", OJ isn't a black man, he's a rich celebrity which effectively makes HIM "the man". To all of you people out there who cry "RACISM!!" at the drop of a hat and say stupid things like "George Bush hates black people", let me remind you of the OJ Simpson trail which proved that our judicial system is bought and sold to the highest bidder and our government who doesn't hate minorities, but doesn't care about POOR PEOPLE.
2006-06-26 05:17:03 · answer #1 · answered by mrknositall 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. I did extensive research on the OJ Simpson trial for my advanced history class. Anyone who researched the trial would come to the conclution that the police framed a guilty man.
Yes, he is guilty....but not in a court of law. He was found not guilty in the murder trial and guilty in the civil trial. The difference is that in the murder trial he could have served jail time for the murders while a civil trial just holds him accountable for his wifes death. He had to give a ton of money to the victims family as a result.
2006-06-26 06:01:25 · answer #2 · answered by mrflawless 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he did not actually do it then he knew of it. But of course this is only one of many opinion that you have got already and most are true. In the end he will be judged by god and will get what is coming to him for sure. He was found guilty in the civil though and that is good. At least he did not get away with it all. I believe he did it or had something to do with it. Why else did he give cops the chase and lie ?
2006-06-26 05:52:05 · answer #3 · answered by copperfish310 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. As someone who watched most of the trail, and the complete look or surprise on his attorney's face (Robert Cardasian), not the slightest doubt whatsoever. I don't think anybody familar with facts has any doubt.
O.J.'s high priced attorneys apparently confused enough of the jurors to prevent the conviction, but he was found guilty in a civil suit, in which only a preponderance of evidence is required.
No unsolved crime, mystery, or conspiracy here, just the most blatantly guilty man to ever be set free.
2006-06-26 05:11:29 · answer #4 · answered by tsmitha1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-06-26 05:14:08 · answer #5 · answered by S. Leroy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only God knows the answer, but I can tell you, if he did or if he did not, he will be judged accordingly, however God sees fit. It is not my place to judge him. I am just observing his life when his name is mentioned, and it is a wait and see. It could come after his death, who knows, if he is innocent, the book will tell the tale in the end. Garnet
2006-06-26 05:36:58 · answer #6 · answered by Garnet 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think west side renee from wlsam 890 roe conn radio show in chicago says he's innocent but I think he's guilty.
2006-06-26 05:09:02 · answer #7 · answered by xx_muggles_xx 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think there wasn't enough clearcut eveidence for the criminal trial. I personally think he is guilty as sin but this is my own opinion (which most of America seems to share).
2006-06-26 05:10:58 · answer #8 · answered by Elizabeth 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think so ,The best scene in the whole trail was him trying to put on the gloves .After soaking in blood and totally drying out,I would like to know who they would have fit.
2006-06-26 05:18:34 · answer #9 · answered by Virginia V 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
2016-06-29 02:25:56 · answer #10 · answered by Christian 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋