2006-06-26 04:17:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It is only useful to the elite globalists who are working toward a one world government. For you and I, it's downright dangerous.
2006-06-26 04:21:50 · answer #1 · answered by ... 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I believe that the U.N. is one big waste of time. They dont do sh** for humanity, every time you turn around theres another scandal taking place, ie "Oil for food scandal". Take a look at all of the big-wigs in the U.N., all of the leadership is taken by members of 3rd-World Hell-Holes who want a world-wide communinst government. They already tried to pass a U.N. tax here, in the States. I dont know about everyone else, but it'll actually be a cold day in Hell before a pay a dime to that band of theives. If the U.N. is soooo bloody worried about humanity and how to save human lives, where the hell were they during Rwanda? When millions of people were being slaughtered with knives and machettis the U.N. was looking the other way wanking each other off while men woman and children alike were being raped and murdered. If you ask me, the day the U.N. tries their take over again, they'll find out what real terrorism is really like.
-J.
2006-06-26 04:33:13 · answer #2 · answered by Jason 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In some ways it has become useless because it did not keep the US from invading the Middle East. In other ways it is important. It's resolutions are a vital part of how people are treated. I think that the U.N. might be struggling in today's society, but it is definitely a big part of our world community.
2006-06-26 04:29:44 · answer #3 · answered by americarocks9 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep. They are only an arm of the world leaders goal to disarm the citizens of various countries. If they were to do the job they should be doing, Rwanda and now Darfur would not have, and would not currently be happening. World hunger would not be a factor. No, the UN is as worthless as the people controlling it. Can anyone remember the last good thing the UN has done? I sure as heck can`t.
2006-06-26 04:35:11 · answer #4 · answered by the_decider 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lets see, what is a good measuring unit to gauge the usefulness and the justification of an organization that works on peaceful and humanitarian missions and other problems throughout the world?
For example, how many people have been killed by the UN this year?
How many guns and other war material has been produced, sold and distributed by the UN this year?
How many countries have been threatened by the UN this year with military consequences?
2006-06-26 05:06:37 · answer #5 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is useless as it is. The powerful countries have a veto that makes useless any serious efforts to change the world. If you take the veto out of the equation the UN would be a real powerful institution. Of course trying to reform the UN will get a veto of one of this powerful countries. So, it is useless trying to change it. We need a new UN without vetoes.
2006-06-26 06:30:00 · answer #6 · answered by Scientist13905 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Name one warring faction the UN has stopped and I can name 20 they have allowed to continue unabated while millions have been slaughtered.
The UN is run by self serving, 3rd world thugs who were living in the trees 2 generations ago.
2006-06-26 04:25:26 · answer #7 · answered by freetyme813 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It failed to stop the United States' illegal invasion of a country that never attacked it. Yeah, that's pretty useless.
2006-06-26 04:25:10 · answer #8 · answered by Tanker100343 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not based on any reality. It brings incompatible nations together--it's like marriages arranged by lottery. Nations should compete, not unite.
2006-06-26 05:56:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
God, yes. Can you name a single crisis the UN has successfully resolved? Because I can't.
2006-06-26 04:53:30 · answer #10 · answered by Incorrectly Political 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋