No one with extreme opinions should run any country. Feminism started out with virtuous goals - equal pay for equal work, the right for women to vote, equal protection under the laws, etc. Those goals were met a long time ago. Now the feminazis want special rights and privileges.
It's time for the feminists to step back and realize that, if they want to be treated as equals, then they must accept equal responsibilities in society. You can't claim to be so easily offended that you have "emotional distress" from hearing someone say something with which you disagree, yet claim you're emotionally strong enough to hold down "manly" jobs.
Personally, I'm rather annoyed with the feminist movement for not stopping when they got the playing field leveled. Now, a man is afraid to open a door for a lady because he might get yelled at or sued for sexual harassment.
Once again, the minority makes the decision for the majority. Thanks a lot. I miss being treated like a lady.
2006-06-26 03:57:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by FozzieBear 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
I believe human nature is what causes many of the problems in the theory of obtaining good government. The issue stems from the inability of humans to make and exercise genuinely free internal or exernal choices or free will that will impact on humans equitably or equally.
I am with Marx when he stated that two of the three aspects of social activity which ground history is the tendency of humans to act to fulfill their needs, and thereafter, the tendency to generate new needs. This human tendency, is what drives the continuing expansion of productive power in human civilisation.
A feminist running the country may very well reverse the gender inequality, banishing men to jobs women hate or leaving evrything as is (i.e. in construction). Social norms play an important part in people's decisions and that construct will not change with the tides of change, unless you're starting from a blank slate.
"Good Government" is not bound by gender, race or language. Good government is in exercising the democratic choice of the people - since we cannot obtain a true egalitarian society - democratic is as good as it gets.
2006-06-26 04:18:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by moved 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
What do you mean? the world IS run by women, If it was run by men, we'd get blo-jobs at the supermarket checkouts instead of loyalty points. cars would be 2 seaters with a bed in the back. monogamy would be illegal you wouldn't need pre-nups cos women wouldnt actually own anything.
Think about it. on average who works the hardest, longest and earns the most? answer = men.
Who gets tro actually spend and enjoy the money? Women. go to any large department store and there is a tiny proportion of the things in there that men want to buy, they are stuffed with things for women.
Healthcare is DOMINATED by women. cures for everything. women can have painles labour, yet Men can't add 10 inches to their *****. if men ruled they all could. and it would be free too.
women rule the world already.
2006-06-26 04:03:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mike H 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I might consider voting for a Camille Paglia-style feminist. She's great.
I consider myself a feminist issues supporter......but I'm in total disagreement with ALLLLL of the feminist leadership, today.
The biggest problem I have with the conservative women's leadership is their reliance on religious bias.
There are strong, smart, intuitive women out there.....they are probably too smart to jump into a political arena with so many sharks around.
2006-06-26 03:58:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by TeaSwami 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, for a week every month we'd have to keep "THE button" under lock and key... Then we'd have to get used to the idea of Lillith Fair replacing football on TV every Sunday afternoon... Maybe have to take a wage cut as a retaliatory measure for the perceived inequities of the modern workplace in regards to gender... Lots of bad stuff.
But I'd vote for a regular woman.
2006-06-26 03:51:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
well i see a lot of people have a problem with the women's period of the month.i mean mostly those chauvinist males
but you know what ,lets say 4 days every month you are scared of the ladies
but what about every day all around the year and all the wars those precious nice men people are causing us
they have there period of testosterone wrong level all the time ,so this is how the world looks like
are you happy with the results??
2006-06-26 05:14:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by qwq 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe the same that would happen when any people devote so much thought to some unique lifestyle - other thoughts that would make them become more complete in other areas of their lifestyle are lessened, inevitably leading to social disorder of some type.
Personally I think reaching for feminism is necessary, but not getting one-sided and extreme.
2006-06-26 03:56:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing bad would happen, but there would be a constitutional ammendment that guaranteed a personal freedom to act as a complete lunatic for a week once a month.
2006-06-26 03:49:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by shoelace 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
WELL I DON'T KNOW ABOUT A FEMINIST BUT IF A WOMAN RAN THE COUNTRY YOU WOULD NOT HAVE A WAR, BECAUSE NO WOMAN OR MOTHER WOULD SEND THEIR SONS AND DAUGHTERS OFF TO FIGHT A WAR, AND PUT THEIR LIVES IN DANGER.
2006-06-26 04:06:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everything would be fine 3 weeks every month, but we'd probably declare a war on a different country every 4th week.
2006-06-26 03:49:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Joker 7
·
0⤊
0⤋