Titled: "Ghostbusters in Hell" I have to say this is taking one franchise tooooo far.
First of all. Bill Murray dropped out. They got Ben Stiller to take his place. If Ben was a side char that would be one thing. But Bill Murray is Ghostbustrs. You could trade Ackroyd and Ramius and be fine but not Murray.
Second. When they first talked of a third movie they were going to base it on the second generation of ghostbusters cartoon where the original cast would do cameos, handing the business over. Again because of the cast changes i think this is bad.
third. the story line. the guys enter a portal that takes them to a dimension where NYC is hell. How bad can you get.
2006-06-26 03:31:49 · 8 answers · asked by clomtancy 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
No i just know that if you watch the movies, he's like the narrator of the story. He's in every scene in some way. He's really waht the story is about.
2006-06-26 03:39:47 · update #1
They didnt take out Bill Murray. Murray took one look at the script and said hell no. So they needed a replacement and got Ben Stiller
2006-06-26 05:19:08 · update #2
That is going to really, really blow. I've got to see it!
2006-06-26 03:35:15 · answer #1 · answered by cucumberlarry1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This doesn't really seem like a question but I have to agree it sounds like a really bad idea for a movie. It's too bad.
2006-06-26 10:38:16 · answer #2 · answered by miguelortize 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 bad
2006-06-26 10:36:02 · answer #3 · answered by christopher 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No you they can't take away Murray!!
2006-06-26 10:51:10 · answer #4 · answered by NEOTEH 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're either related to bill murray or you're him.
2006-06-26 10:37:56 · answer #5 · answered by with_dark_motives 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well that means the movie is gonna really suck!
2006-06-26 10:34:07 · answer #6 · answered by _ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yup sounds like crap
2006-06-26 10:35:14 · answer #7 · answered by gimmieswag 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OMG....Say it isn't so!
2006-06-26 10:34:31 · answer #8 · answered by jab92593 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋