Can you explain the hypocrisy of the left?

Answer 1

They equate money with intelligence. Since there are fewer people who have very high incomes than there are low-to-medium income people, they assume that the majority people are stupid...and will believe anything.

I've met some very intelligent people at the homeless shelter...and seen some incredibly stupid ones living in mansions...e.g. Ted Kennedy...John Edwards...John Kerry...etc. They're completely out of touch with the real world.

Answer 2

Different approaches amongst different groups and individuals -- if you take the 'left' as monolithic, then of course there will appear to be hypocrisy. But if you look at the actions of individuals, you'll see a lot more consistency.
Unavoidable compromises -- it's hard to live true to a way of thinking that runs counter to the prevailing forces. Consumer choice is a good example, I would prefer to buy organic but today I chose not to take the time to go to a store which carries it. I don't have a car by choice -- if I did, then I would have been more likely to go out of my way to be able to buy organic, but I would have added more to pollution. Call me a hypocrite if you like, but I'm doing the best that I can.
Biased media coverage. Like the one about the media being leftist.

Beyond that, it's a bit difficult without something a wee bit more specific to work with.

But then I'm guessing you don't really want to understand, just to rant.

Answer 3

What about the hypocricy of the right?

It's not okay to kill unborn babies. But it's okay to kill adults. Yeah, yeah, yeah I know. Democrats are against killing adults but okay with killing unborn babies. The flaw in that reasoning is the Democrats are in favor of letting the person make that descision instead of being told what to do.

They claim to be Christian. And yet Jesus says to turn the other cheek. But Republicans support the death penalty and maximum sentancing.

The right says that the 2nd Amendment gives them the right to bear arms even though the founding fathers couldn't have envisioned fully automatic weapons. But it's okay for them to totally take a big steaming dump on the 4th amendment and support warantless searches because the founding fathers couldn't have envisioned terrorism.

The right claim to be in support of the "little man" even though when Republicans are in command the rich get insanely richer.

The right claim that it's the Democrats that believe in big government. Even though government spending is breaking all the records under the Bush Administration.

I think it's obvious which party is full of more hypocricy.

Answer 4

As a women people who grew up in a international the place a woman might desire to no longer get credit without a father or husband to co sign for her; the place as recently by way of fact the overdue 1980's i grew to become into asked at a docs workplace if i grew to become into married or if my father grew to become into nonetheless to blame for me - this when I had handed over an insurance card for me, in my call, from my pastime, and nonetheless in a international the place women actual everyone seems to be paid much less for the same artwork than adult adult males - properly, for sure I easily have a very distinctive handle affirmative action than you do. i'm ambivalent approximately hate crime legislations yet no longer on your motives, particularly by way of fact those issues are already unlawful and as above if the guidelines have been enforced we does no longer have an issue. even with the incontrovertible fact that, even now, the severity of a sentence for committing against the regulation against a minority, racial or sexual decision, is decrease than the severity of the sentence for committing against the regulation against a white on the instant individual. So possibly yet another regulation easily grew to become into mandatory. in case you seem on the disparity in gross revenues ranges, cutting-edge financial rules have already redistributed the money from the decimated center instructions and given it to the wealthiest human beings. So i'm questioning which you're actually not observing this question from all perspectives. it quite is a functional ability to overview, seeing a query from extra advantageous than purely your individual slender perspective. Have a great weekend.

Answer 5

. Hypocrisy is the foulest quality of all.
Many (conservative) commentators have written about recent hypocrisy's, but I would like to draw your attention particularly to a column by Michelle Malkin, which begins, "The Bush-bashers who have relentlessly accused the president and his War on Terror team of acting like jackbooted bigots are now imperiously attacking them for acting like light-footed fumblers.
The New York Times, for example, thinks that George W. Bush was inexcusably derelict. But this same editorial board flayed the administration for fingerprinting young male temporary visa holders traveling from terror-sponsoring and terror-friendly nations, for temporarily detaining asylum-seekers from high-risk countries for background screening,for sending undercover agents to investigate mosques suspected of supporting terrorism.

Answer 6

Left, right, middle, it matters not, all people bear greed, gullibility, and ignorance... and all people form opinions, thus choose their own way of life, but until people stop pointing their fingers and learn to mind their own business, the hypocrisy of all people will haunt us for a long long time.

Answer 7

Its just a ploy to divide the public. The left and the right are really conspiring to use and abuse their power and influence and comming up with stuff for the general public to argue about to take the attention away from what they are really doing behind the scenes.

Answer 8

Can you explain the hypocrisy of the right? ;)

http://www.armchairsubversive.com/

http://www.newshounds.us/2005/05/06/bizarre_sex_habits_of_the_extreme_rightwing.php

My personal favorite, government study showing Bush foreign policy has multiplied terrorism astronomically:
http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20060428112209-29811.pdf

Answer 9

To explain it, one would have to understand it.
I can't seem to figure out what the hell any one of them is talking about.

Answer 10

Greed for power