9/11 is the latest of a LONG line of "false-flag" attacks American government has used to garner popular support for an unpopular war effort. Research the following items if you want to know more:
U.S.S. Maine (verifiable fact it was "false flag")
U.S.S. Lusitania (still controversial)
Pearl Harbor (not a surprise at all, verifiable fact)
U.S.S. Liberty (heart-breaking in it's blatancy, verifiable fact)
Operation Northwoods (verifiable fact, was only used for the above, and maybe 9/11)
Gulf of Tonkin incident (verfiably NEVER HAPPENED)
Iraq-Kuwait Invasion (done with our blessing)
Oklahoma City bombing (disputed, Clinton's way of saying "let's pass a little gun control")
WTC basement bombing (totally false flag, disputed)
Kennedy assassination (you would have to be a retard to believe the government's official "magic bullet" theory)
9/11 (scientifically proven fact it was controlled demolition, needs supporting evidence from other aspects)
Who is "directly" behind the events are often foreign intelligence services or agents here with our blessing and our aid. We also run a number of "black bag" units under direct control of members of the administration and CIA that answer to select handlers, and by Eisenhower's presidential order, have "no accountability for any crimes committed in the perpetuation of their duties" (aka a "license to kill"). As far as motive, they have none other than telling themselves they are "true patriots" in carrying out the dirty work of those in power.
As far as the motives of those giving the orders, it varies...lots to be had by snuffing political opposition, making an un-popular war into something popular, and simple personal financial gain while you have the world's best-trained and best-equipped hitmen at your disposal for a brief while.
2006-06-26 01:57:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by lostinromania 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Very little similarity, except for the fact that stupid men used them to fight a war with very different people for very different reasons that had virtually nothing to do with the sinking of the Lusitania or the crashing of the 4 planes.
And for all the putzes out there thinking it was a conspiracy, I would ask you to friggin' just stop. You think you are doing good by asking why the fed is close-lipped about their intelligence sources. That is never going to change, and you only make opponents of people who like secrecy look sane when compared to your missile plane and detonated trade center theories.
Grow up. Socialist-funded nonsense like this does NO ONE any good.
2006-07-03 07:18:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by arcayne_1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you talking about the Lusitania sunk by German torpedoes? How are they similar? The Lusitania was sunk in a time of war and there also has been conspiracies that the Lusitania was carrying arms to Britain.
2006-07-03 17:15:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
very similar to the lusitania, a "false flag operation", and as per who's behind it certainly the present adminstration, whom stood the most to gain. But ultimately it was those within the upper echelon of the globalist movement.
2006-06-26 08:22:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by iconoclast_ensues 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow, there's a lot of black helicopter freaks around here. Oh the question. Yeah you can argue some similarities, the most significant being the catalyst to war.
2006-07-08 15:17:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Eric M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
9/11 was perpetrated by our own government.
Our mainstream media is hiding the facts that would bring this out in the open.
Our citizens are in denial, or are afraid to realize or learn the truth.
2006-06-26 08:17:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Truth Seeker 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
911 is POSSIBLY more correctly simular to the burning of the reichstag in pre WW2 germany.
2006-07-03 22:44:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by willberb 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not similar enough to compare.
2006-07-05 19:25:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jacida 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dear just will, take your freaking medication and shut the hell up!
2006-07-08 14:15:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by keepitsafe2think 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
one was a government the other a cult
2006-06-26 08:17:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋