I've used Google earth to compare the metropolitan areas of many cities but there seem to be too many variables to consider (e.g. where does the city actually end, etc.)
2006-06-25 18:03:47 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Trivia
No, I would have to disagee with both Sao Paolo or Mexico city. I checked this out in google Earth and found that, while these two cities are gigantic, Los Angeles and Houston are both geographically more vast.
2006-06-25 18:18:52 · update #1
Tokyo
2006-06-25 18:25:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
section sensible the biggest city on earth is manhattan approximately 17,884 Km and as far as inhabitants is in contact Tokyo approximately 32,450,000 human lives whilst Indian cities ranks 18,six hundred,000 inhabitants 3,182 section Delhi 8 19,2 hundred,000 inhabitants 2,350 section Mumbai 5 15,one hundred,000 inhabitants a million,785 section kolkata 14
2016-12-08 12:41:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll take a guess at this. How about Wellington, New Zealand? I may have the name wrong, geography is not my strong point, but it is the capital. It covers 290 square miles according to their website
2006-06-25 22:25:40 · answer #3 · answered by dracomullet 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mexico City is both the world's largest and most polluted.
2006-06-25 18:08:32 · answer #4 · answered by Dr. Neema 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
either Mexico city or Sao Paulo in brazil
2006-06-25 18:08:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
bombay india
2006-06-25 19:44:11 · answer #6 · answered by citygirl18 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ITS CHICAGO I GUESS ACCORDING TO THIS SITE...
2006-06-25 19:28:45 · answer #7 · answered by shr_remix 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋