English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

The Democrat Party has lost the center
It listened to the extreme left activists
and forgot that all support is really from the moderate center

Worry not - because the Republicans are so fringe with the far right, that they are killing themselves too.

What you are seeing with your party today, they will see with their party tomorrow

Hopefully we will get a nice moderate party to form and lead our great nation

2006-06-25 15:02:33 · answer #1 · answered by Dan W 5 · 1 0

Out of sheer hatred for Bush, progressives can agree that the war party in power should be brought down. But the Democratic Party is a war party in waiting.

"Lesser evil" support for the Democrats has been repeated by sections of the left every four years since the Great Depression. But far from broadening the scope of left-wing politics, it has stunted the development of a radical social movement in the U.S. For this reason, it is necessary to view the role of "lesser evil" politics historically.

The term "fascist" has also been applied to conservative Republicans Barry Goldwater in 1964, Richard Nixon in the 1970s, as well as Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr. in the 1980s, to express the urgency of voting Democrat on Election Day. To be sure, this Bush administration, dominated by neoconservatives, models itself on Reagan’s.

And there are differences between the Democratic and Republican Parties on issues such as abortion rights. But the two parties, each funded and controlled by corporate donors, agree on fundamental aims, if not on the strategies to achieve them.

Both are pro-capitalist and pro-imperialist--dedicated to furthering the interests of the U.S. ruling class at home and expanding U.S. power globally. Bloody wars and political repression are neither unique to this Bush administration, nor to Republicans.

I think supporting a third party to force the Democrats to the Left, if you won't by default elect a Republican (don't do this in a swing state) is the right approach. Third parties bring up issues that force the Democrats to comment on. Often third parties galvanize people on issues the Democrats won't touch - such as anti-war...
this is necessary.

2006-06-25 15:03:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Democratic party is owned by the same corporations that own the Republican party. The "two party system" is only there to keep people diverted from solving real issues. Instead we get treated to "debate" on flag burning while the people starve, and die from lack of adiquate health care.

"Oh well, they're poor.......they don't deserve to live."

Nothing will change until the people re-take the government from the corporations.

2006-06-25 15:03:34 · answer #3 · answered by BarronVonUnderbeiht 3 · 0 0

You are screaming because your once great party has been infiltrated by far left liberals, hell bound on destroying everything that made this country great. They have waged war on Christianty, the very backbone of American values, and they will not stop until God is removed from every corner of the states.

2006-06-25 15:15:00 · answer #4 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 0 0

funds talks, bs walks. i do no longer think of Obama is a foul guy, yet I easily have themes w/ Hillary. bill Richardson might have been a great candidate, and grew to become into my first decision. I desire Huckabee might have gained the Republican part. a minimum of he's not an entire jerk. John McCain grew to become into asked approximately scientific marijuana and it grew to become into published on youtube. as an issue of fact, this guy grew to become into courageous adequate to ask all of the applicants. Too me, whilst human beings answer a query like that, I value like i'm getting a good thought the place somebody is coming from. John McCain thoroughly handed over this guy. Hillary placated him. Obama spoke back yet quickly. John Edwards went into great element and that i consider what he pronounced. i think of he'd be a great vice chairman no matter who gets the nomination. ok, now i'm executed ranting.

2016-12-09 01:31:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Because the Democrats place symbolism over substance, every time in every issue.

2006-06-30 03:03:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What is happened is your party is fractured. You have so many factions. Take Iraq for example you thosew who want to pull out now, thsoe who want a schedule, and those who want to stay the course.

2006-06-25 15:51:07 · answer #7 · answered by shakeragroad_2000 4 · 0 0

You have let your party be taken over by communist organizations and 10 senators who, if this was DURING WWII, would have arrested and charged with sedition, treason, aiding and abetting the enemy of the USA, and other charges.

2006-06-25 15:00:42 · answer #8 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 0

You have sold your soul to the labor unions, race baiters, tree huggers/eco terrorists, homosexual activists, anti american multiculturists etc. To just list a few.

2006-06-25 15:02:02 · answer #9 · answered by Dr. Bugly 4 · 0 0

Nobody knows whats going on thats why thier called the demodumbies

2006-07-01 14:57:50 · answer #10 · answered by NIU HUSKIE FAN 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers