The NEXT President will have to deal with ending my war,
its not going to be on MY watch...
Is this morally acceptable to the American people?
2006-06-25 14:36:54 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
To Shug and Ben, you obviously DON'T remember 9/11. Osama bin Laden, a Saudi, attacked the United States on that day. However, instead of going after the person who attacked us, Georgie went after Iraq. Where is Osama? In Tora Bora, protected by the Conserviweenies who're scared of protecting us just because Pakistan is harboring a terrorist. As for Iraq, this is for oil. Where were you?
2006-06-25 15:46:41 · answer #1 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wow -- I do not think there is a war in American history that was ended by the president that was in office when it started. He could bring everyone home and be done with it though.
We also would not have gone there if for not our Congress and Represenatives had voted us to do so. That would be a majority of both parties. President Bush is not personally responsible no matter how hard you try to make him. Not that I agree or like him too much myself. The world also has to thank the United Nations for the Iraq war as well.
2006-06-25 22:22:32 · answer #2 · answered by Jay 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think any prez should start a war without first considering the long term effects on both countries. I dont think any president shold have the right to override the senate or UN when it comes to making this decision. I believe Bush was acting out of his feelings for Saddam. Iraq is a disaster that should never have started and we this Iraq war has nothing at all to do with Twin Towers. Our soldiers should be brought home.
2006-06-25 22:04:17 · answer #3 · answered by ncgirl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you forget about Sept. 11? Did you forget we got Sadaam Hussein? I agree the war is going on a little long but we should support our president. I'm glad we have a president with a backbone. What would the terriorists have done if we would've let them get away with what they did to us? And by not supporting the war this would seem to me to send out a message to our troops that we don't care that they are over there nor what they are going through. At least this president seems to have some morals unlike Clinton. I was ashamed to call him my president. For the sake of our country we need to get back to morality. I support our president & our troops. I think you should to.
2006-06-25 21:48:17 · answer #4 · answered by Sugar Dumplin 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know, Bush is a smart man. He's made a couple mistakes, but who the hell hasn't. I believe what he's done/will do is all in good manner. He knows what he's doing overall. and many people don't understand that. You see, many people in America are stupid. And they expect our president to be God, so they expect perfection and answers. This cannot happen, because Bush isn't God (although he's close). So this is why there is so much controversy, b/c liberals are all morons that like to marry morons, and give birth to morons, then take their moronic family to mcdonalds to get fat with the rest of the morons out there so they all just fit in.
2006-06-25 21:41:04 · answer #5 · answered by algal1120 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wasn't aware that he said that. I think we are at war for a good reason. I don't understand how we can just sit back on not do anything to Iraq after what they did to us. The ones bashing Bush are the lucky ones who didn't loose a loved one on 9/11.
2006-06-25 21:40:07 · answer #6 · answered by J~Me 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What about the war against America?
Remember the twin towers?
Morality has nothing to do with war.
That is an Islamic concept.
2006-06-25 21:39:12 · answer #7 · answered by Texas Cowboy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hes president, hes in the chair now and if he feels like doing so its his right.
He doesnt need the acceptance of all the people in the US, thats how the voting system works.
So people better think twice next time they vote!
2006-06-25 21:41:46 · answer #8 · answered by ganja_claus 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont think anything bush does is right. the next president is going to have a bad reputation because of bush, just like wat happened to Martin van beuren when he took office after andrew Jackson. 52% of americans want bush impeached and i agree. bush should ull the troops out now because we acomplished what we went to iraq to do. iraq is stable enough for us to leave. we shouldn't hav gone in in the first place because the USA is NOT the world police. is we gradually startd pulling out now we would save millions of lives and dollar$ and iraq would be perfectly fine.
2006-06-25 21:41:16 · answer #9 · answered by fify 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He didnt shrug it off.
He challenged the next President to finish it the right way.
By staying the course.
2006-06-25 21:41:10 · answer #10 · answered by snakeman11426 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋