sorry you cant pick both
2006-06-25 12:08:04 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
To solve either or both, there is a much bigger problem at the core of each that you mention that has to be solved -- for all time -- first.
Mankind's Problems--Will They Ever End? ; They Are Soon to End
http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/2002/6/15/article_01.htm
2006-06-29 12:45:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If we had guaranteed world peace, we could end world hunger by diverting some of the massive amounts of money countries spend on defense to coming up with solutions to world hunger!
While it's true the hungry people are less likely to want to be "peaceful," there are other basic needs that people have besides food that could perpetuate war, as well as ideological/religious differences that incite war. So I think it's more likely that world peace could lead to the end of world hunger than that solving world hunger would lead to world peace.
2006-06-25 12:19:24 · answer #2 · answered by AnswerLady 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
World Peace first, then once we had peace I would worry about world hunger,because if we are all going to get along, I am sure we can think of a way to relieve the world of its hunger.
2006-06-25 12:12:45 · answer #3 · answered by brown.gloria@yahoo.com 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think if you made the world at peace, then you would probably solve many problems including world hunger, So I say World Peace!
2006-06-25 12:10:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
World hunger, maybe if everybody was fed they wouldn't be so crabby. And I think that there are too many different opinions and points of view in the world for there ever to be world peace. You can't have marriage without arguments so how can billions of people get along all the time?
2006-06-27 18:51:53 · answer #5 · answered by peach_campbell 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
World Peace - that would mean the end to world hunger! Lol
2006-06-25 12:11:01 · answer #6 · answered by miss_gem_01 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YO! If you solve world hunger, you would have a much better chance at attaining world peace. The two kind of go hand in hand.
2006-06-25 12:12:42 · answer #7 · answered by snoweagleltd 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hunger
2006-06-25 12:11:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Peace, hunger will be solved with peace
2006-06-26 16:59:51 · answer #9 · answered by Me 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would say world hunger because there seem to be a never ending to war. but feeding the children from the young to the old all over the nation is what i would pick .
2006-06-25 12:44:21 · answer #10 · answered by o 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
world peace, it could lead to the end of world hunger.
2006-06-25 12:42:26 · answer #11 · answered by khiystal_23 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋