Why are the Republicans now saying it was OUR war when...?

Question

On February 15th and 16th, 2003, close to 10 MILLION people in over 50 countries tried to stop George's war before it started...

I was always against Bush starting his war
DON'T YOU DARE SAY ITS MY WAR ALSO!

If Gore were President
He would have gone after BIN LADEN
NOT SADDAM!
Why?
BECAUSE SADDAM DIDN'T TRY TO KILL HIS DADDY...


Again...
Republicans....
DON'T YOU EVER, EVER DARE
TELL ME ITS MY WAR ALSO...

(Bush is breeding terrorist, not stopping them...DUH!)

Answer 1

I don't support war either! I think the reason that terrorists keep coming after us is because the U.S. is the biggest bully on the planet! These countries get into it, & it's like 2 kindergardeners dukin' it out, 'til we come along like the Senior Football star and choose a side! Not very fair hua? But it is all about the oil. the oil, the oil, and Mama Bush's precious stock! In the OIL!!!
Actually, we didn't put the idiot in the White House, a "miscount" did!
No blood on my hands, ain't my war either!!!

Answer 2

First of all Gore did NOT go after the terriorists after the 1993 bombings, instead he and Clinton IGNORED them.

Second those millions who didn't want to go to war in 2003 did NOT include the Liberals in congress as THEY voted to go to war.

Third...this war doesn't "belong" to anyone... I have always been against action in Iraq for the main reason you feel..it is revenage for the attemp on his father. Giving Ahmed Chalabi as a source credibility was STUPID.

I, as an American, must bear the burdons that my governemnt put on me...ie the current welfare system; however, it may not be MY welfare system I am forced to accept it...as you this war...sucks doesn't it.

Answer 3

Beacuse, as a Bush family hero remarked, people are much more likely to believe a big lie than a small one.

Answer 4

Believe me, I'm no Bush supporter, but if Al Gore were President we'd all be dead.

-J.

Answer 5

We're still after Bin Laden, and we're still going to get him. It's just a matter of time.

Gore is a joke.

Answer 6

first we must find a way to stop the so called rebuilding of Iraq and afghanistan, it is not worht dying for,

Answer 7

You're an American so it is your war also.

Answer 8

it saddens me to tell you, you forgot your medicine again.

Answer 9

IT IS YOUR WAR. IT IS YOUR WAR.

Your spineless leaders say its your war too everytime they vote to keep your troops there and fund them. Sorry but now I guess you know how it feels to be lied to by a liberal.

BTW lemming, did I mention it was your war too?

Found in Iraq:

* 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium
* 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents
* 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more deadly than sarin gas)
* Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over populated areas
* Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and “conventional” sarin gas, assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency

http://www.usembassy-dhaka.org/state/sta...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3...


http://www.military.com/newscontent/0,13...

http://transcripts.cnn.com/transcripts/0...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,1201...


More quotes for you guys. Looks like the liberals agreed there were WMD.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002


"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002


"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002


"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002


"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002


"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002


"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002


"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001


"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999


"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998


"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998


"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998


"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998