There are over 300 admonitions against Breeder's in the Bible and less than a dozen for Gays (all found in the Old Testament, with most being listed under Levitical Law ... which, according to my Christian friends, is old, out-dated and useless)?
I don't think it's that the Breeder's are necessarily bad; they just need closer supervision.
What say you?
2006-06-25 08:27:35 · 5 answers · asked by Specious λ Neurotica 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
In re: UncleFrunk's objection to the use of the word "Breeder":
It is a term I've used for some time -- as have, and do, many others.
As with all things, this word should be taken and used in context.
It is neither vulgar, foul or derogatory.
If one used the word "******", as many do in the GLBT community in a contextual environment -- as within
the community to express affection/affiliation, and most importantly, unity and "ownership" of a term that for years was a word used by others to describe and use against one person (or a group) who is considered a sexual deviant or one demonstrating aberrant behavior (fixed or not) or some other perceived unacceptable representation (use you own example here), then it should be *accepted* and freely used within context...as the GLBT community has done, as well as with other words such as "dyke", "queer", etc.
"Breeder", used in context [here], is perfectly acceptable and you should feel free to be comfortable when seeing it again.
2006-06-25 18:32:47 · update #1
I say LOL! But please don't use the term breeder - it's as bad as f@ggot (dear Yahoo! what if I really wanted to talk about a bundle of sticks or pork and onion meatballs?)
2006-06-25 10:37:38 · answer #1 · answered by unclefrunk 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm just sick of the Bible being misused for hate.It's suppose to be about love.But then there has always been a group that the Bible was used to justify hate towards.Anything from non-Christians to alleged witches to blacks to native North and South Americans to gays.All of these groups and some I left out have suffered in one form or another at the hands of the 'righteous'.
2006-06-25 08:37:21 · answer #2 · answered by BuckFush 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In this day and age to bring more children into a decaying world is wrong. I made the choice not to be a breeder for that reason in 1967.
2006-06-25 08:44:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think that the old testament is as valuable as the new,many people think that the old was crossed out because of the good medicine man(Jesus)if you read job,it is very useful,with out the book of job,i doubt that i would have ever picked that book up.and i think that it is good when you cant understand something, to learn about it,not hate it.
2006-06-25 08:37:03 · answer #4 · answered by deerwoman777 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i say that it's just more prof that god is closer to death. more and more of his followers are, thankfully, breaking his laws. by being okay with gay, you are breaking his laws. by being okay with lust, you are breaking his laws. by being okay with greed, sex out of wed-lock, expressing hate for people you don't like, and many other common things, you are breaking his laws. and i applaud that with a standing ovation.
2006-06-25 08:43:52 · answer #5 · answered by gaygoddevil 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋