2006-06-25 06:52:21 · 6 answers · asked by Angila C 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
From the standpoint of classical liberalism, welfare would never have come into existence, but families and charities would take care of those unemployed or unemployable. That would definitely put some emphasis back on the family, which is absolutely obliterated by the welfare system. Noone on welfare depends upon a breadwinner, but rather on their buddy - Big Brother.
Classical liberalism placed emphasis on individual responsibility, whereas a welfare state is a malignant cancer that rewards those void of personal responsibility.
However, corporate welfare is far more an agregious form of redistribution of wealth than society's well-intentioned, though flawed attempts to help the poor.
2006-06-25 06:59:19 · answer #1 · answered by rlw 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, where's my government check? I have cable and cell phone bills to pay.
2006-06-25 15:03:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Take from those that work to give to those who can not or will not.
2006-06-25 14:00:45 · answer #3 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cloud you elaborate a bit?
2006-06-25 13:55:51 · answer #4 · answered by XsylviaO 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So what is your question?
2006-06-25 13:57:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
whut?
2006-06-25 15:33:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋