2006-06-25 04:50:05 · 6 answers · asked by neoflippintrukid 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Other - Family & Relationships
this is a question that is not hypothetical. This is a question that involes the reality of life. If God had created the MAN to bear the children? I"m looking for an answer that answers that questions...I don't need an idotic answer.....thanks.
2006-06-25 06:01:03 · update #1
Yes. Women would take over the man's role.
2006-06-25 04:56:01 · answer #1 · answered by Her Majesty 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
LMAO! This is a good one! Yes, I like the thought of a man having a baby! Just think, it could be "wonderful" and a "beautiful experience" *really laughing hard now*!
Well duh, sure there would still be a need for women, not all men would want to deal with the breast feedings at 3:AM, or changing the diapers, bathing and caring for the baby etc.
Sorry but the all of that wonderful, "beautiful" time that a woman spends bringing forth life, is probably not going out of style anytime soon. Ask 20 men if they would want to give birth if they could, and I would be willing to bet if you are asking any men who have seen a baby's delivery, they would decline that particular offer of presumed "pleasure". Even more of them would nix the idea of having to take care of the baby 24/7 after giving birth to it.
I hate to have to tell you sport, but most men are afraid of passing a kidney stone, so I am sure passing even a 6 pound baby would not be their choice at all! I have seen some men who look like they are pregnant, but if they found out that they really were pregnant, I bet they would be trying to escape all of the beauty of a "natural childbirth" by trying to deliver by C-section!
So for the time being, consider this old saying: The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world." I don't think you will be able to rid yourself of the female gender any time soon. 'Fraid you are stuck with us for reproductive purposes (mostly).
Why do you want to question simple biology? Good luck with finding men who want to bear and care for children, I am sure there will be a few, but the delivery part of it may be where you lose most of your volunteers. We should NEVER forget staying up all night with a screaming child with croup, while teething or with the colic or diarrhea all night... (that may be a deal breaker too!) It's always nice to have a mommy around, or someone who is maternal, I suppose if a woman can drive heavy equipment a man could raise a child? It's the birthing part that might be a problem, I guess?
2006-06-25 12:22:36 · answer #2 · answered by ruthie_msw 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A man would never be woman enough to bear a child....the first signs of labor a man will die of terror....and if men had to go trough child birth and delivery the worLds population be like maybe ten people?? no honey men can handle this.... dont even think about it. just imagine squezing a ten pound watermelon through your pee hole... or your butt hole LOL... just think about the things you say.......
2006-06-25 11:57:01 · answer #3 · answered by boricua_2290 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If men could have babies, children grow up more attached to daddies rather than mommies for nurturing love.
2006-06-25 11:59:58 · answer #4 · answered by Timeless - watcher 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that women would still be needed. Just as men are needed. Its not required, but it sure is nice to have some to count on.
2006-07-01 14:16:48 · answer #5 · answered by lovelysweetmaiden 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course you'd never find the remote or the beer!
2006-06-25 12:06:24 · answer #6 · answered by Clyde 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋