2006-06-25 03:11:57 · 24 answers · asked by pyrohypnotik 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Not only was he instrumental in the deaths of thousands of lives on September 11th, (YES, i believe it was a conspiracy) he irresponsibly keeps thous ads of troops in unnecessary danger by not providing them with the proper protection and equipment. In addition to that, he completely ignored the hundreds of warnings of hurricane Katrina. the blood of these Americans is on his hands. GUILTY!
2006-06-25 03:17:23 · answer #1 · answered by shooda487 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Maybe not murder, but poor judgment following the bad advice of Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Carl Rove. Judging public opinion by only listing to Fox News. Abandoning the Geneva Convention, and violation of the most basic constitutional rights we have or used to have.
2006-06-25 03:26:20 · answer #2 · answered by kniggs 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gimme a break. Look, those in the military knew that they might have to die for their country when they first went in and they were willing to take that chance. Sooooooo nooooooo Bush is not a murder. Death comes with the territory, and I have the upmost respect for the ones who proudly fight for our freedom. The rest are just weak.
2006-06-25 03:23:01 · answer #3 · answered by cabcp 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know are the insurgents killing our people murderers? Why is it that all you people condemn a man who acted when we were attacked and so many lives were lost. Your complacency is a disgrace to this great nation of ours. Go try living in another country if you don't like it here and complain there and see what you get.
2006-06-25 03:16:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
unfortunately, bush is not guilty of murder. however, he is guilty of getting us into a war that is solving nothing, only costing us millions of lives, money, and time. btw, i support our troops, but i dont support bush getting them killed!! troops are NOT dying for our country, they are dying for the mistakes our president makes. they might have known they could be killed, but does it have to be for a stupid reason?
2006-06-25 09:40:30 · answer #5 · answered by neenerneener 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Guilty are the people who had chosen him as President. As a President, he is doing a wonderful job.
2006-06-25 03:17:59 · answer #6 · answered by tnkumar1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dou mean like people dying from the war? ppl die in wars to protect u, and give u freedom. we wouldnt be here if it wasnt for the people whi have died in wars. we cant charge the president with murder, because when u go into war, u haveta expect that u might loose somebody
2006-06-25 03:16:11 · answer #7 · answered by the ultimate lacrosse player 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutley, all the military men and women killed in Iraq, he's guilty for their murders.
2006-06-25 03:14:15 · answer #8 · answered by Jason N 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Based of definition alone he is an accomplice and accessory after the fact ...........
hom·i·cide (hm-sd, hm-) KEY
NOUN:
The killing of one person by another.
A person who kills another person.
************************************************
ac·com·plice (-kmpls) KEY
NOUN:
An associate in wrongdoing, especially one who aids or abets another in a criminal act, either as a principal or an accessory.
Law
One who incites, aids, or abets a lawbreaker in the commission of a crime but is not present at the time of the crime. Also called accessory before the fact .
One who aids a criminal after the commission of a crime, but was not present at the time of the crime. Also called accessory after the fact .
2006-06-25 03:40:58 · answer #9 · answered by ib5150wi 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
would you be guilty of murder if you killed someone protecing your house are your family ????
If you don,t think so then BUSH is not!!!!!
2006-06-25 03:22:05 · answer #10 · answered by walterstoney 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋