How would you respond if you come home & there is no home because it was bombed while you wife and three kids where sleeping, now they are dead. Way to go a insurgent is born.
2006-06-25 02:19:47 · 13 answers · asked by dchella 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well, that's what Dan Rather would want you to think is going on. 'Insurgent' kind of implies they are rebelling against their own government, so that is the wrong word. Most of the terrorists fighting our forces and murdering Iraqi civillians are illegal immigrants from Iran. They are young people poisoned by the preaching of Islamic Jihad in other countries, brainwashed into thinking they are doing some holy thing, and then smuggled into Iraq from Iran. Iran is the big bad guy here. Their extremist government is behind all the fighting. The left-wing media outlets just want you to think George Bush is a bad guy because 1. They are primarily owned by foreigners with vested interestes in seeing the US effort in Iraq fail, and 2. They are left-wing nut-jobs themselves who want to see the Democrats take back all branches of the government so they can get the US to surrender its sovreignity to the UN and a worldwide communist government can begin.
2006-06-25 02:30:45 · answer #1 · answered by rumplesnitz 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
This definition should help.
They ARE insurgents by definition, just as we were when we started the American Revolution against the British.
An insurgency is an armed uprising, revolt, or insurrection against an established civil or political authority, such as a constituted government or a military occupation by an invading force. Persons engaging in insurgency are called insurgents.
The root of the work insurgent means " to rise (up or against)".
It doesn't matter what country you are from, as long as you are against the established authority.
2006-06-25 02:28:27 · answer #2 · answered by Truth 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok lets put it your way, vice versa lets say your an average Iraqi male , your mother is killed by a car bomb, wouldnt you be mad thus this gives way to a whole new generation of iraqi warriors, they have something to fight for. Dont you get my point im trying to make here. the insurgents are killing their own people. Way to go an Iraqi soldier is born, HOOO RAAAH
2006-06-25 17:54:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if they were from their own country that would be one thing but most of these scum bags are from other middle east countries. You know, the usual suspects, syria, iran, jordan.....
That's about as stupid as calling the French soldiers insurgents when they were helping us against the English.
BTW -
TRUTH(LESS) - try this definition that you "conveniently" omitted.
2 : one who acts contrary to the policies and decisions of one's OWN political party.
I would love to see one question answered by a liberal that wasn't full of lies and half truth's. Is that possible for a change?
2006-06-25 02:25:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are merely insurgants from the American point of view. I'm sure from their point of view, what they are doing is perfectly acceptable, and probably the right way to act. No villain in history has thought that they were wrong, they just act according to their own viewpoint.
2006-06-25 02:24:17 · answer #5 · answered by Ian M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do I consider a statistic? it is an fairly stupid question. My answer is "no", i do no longer think that unlawful aliens are killing precisely 12 individuals an afternoon. in component of fact that all of us got here from different international locations initially, except you're a close-by American, and who're we to place rules on who else can come and prosper here? The humorous component is that an poor lot of those Republican anti-immigration nutjobs are professing to be Christians, and what could desire to be greater rightious than telling human beings to stay in thier very own impoverished united states, go through, and die so as that we are able to have somewhat greater elbow room. while you're heavily in touch that illegals are killing greater of those "rightful" individuals than this pointless and greed fueled warfare why do no longer you plan something clever, like combating the warfare and spending the billions of dollars that finally end up in Haliburtons wallet on fixing our poverty difficulty by starting to be jobs and investment courses for whoever desires to be a effective component of our society.
2016-12-08 12:27:55 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Al, Hillary, and I agree with you.
Just as those proud Nazi's who refused to quit after the allies stomped them were insurgents, so are these brave freedom fighters.
We just have to overlook the minor detail they at least the Nazi's were all Germans. Hey, were libsters so we are allowed to re-write history so let's make them Jamaicans.
2006-06-25 03:05:34 · answer #7 · answered by never_touched_her 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are not the Protectors of Iraq, they terrorize Innocent Iraqis.
The real Protectors of Iraq are the Iraqi Army who the U.S. and allied forces are training till the Iraqi Army is able to do all that on it's own.
2006-06-25 03:08:59 · answer #8 · answered by MrCool1978 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i can explain it
we heard the word "insurgent" from western media, and western media is liar, they report imbalancedly
i think such iraqis are deserve to be called hero,liberator, or something like that
no western media!!
2006-06-25 02:33:13 · answer #9 · answered by arifin ceper 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most insurgents are not even Iraqi. Please study the facts, not just sound bites and rhetoric. You may think you sound intelligent, but your failing miserably at it.
2006-06-25 02:24:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋