its very hard for us married couples that away for years but due to financial unstability we ned to choose to be apart to sustain the neds of family. at first we cant surpass the pain that apart for years but as time and months goes by we can handle and manage that feeling that occurs especially when ur alone and no one ned to tak too esp. if u want ur huby to be with u.. but im thankful of this modern technology cos i can see him now on cam and the feeling of emptiness lessen a lot but not im saying that it totally lessen but atleast it help much coz unlike cellphones or landlines doesnt give enough. but only more on wasting money not seeing his entire face or wat he doing there talking to u. but in terms of love there must be no communication gap so that no doubts at all coz long distance love affair is very hard.. esp. if ur already married and finaly we can surpass this loneliness with the help of our dear Lord to tighten the bond of marriage and to resist temptation....
2006-06-25 01:21:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by kris 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think money is important. You have to have it to survive in this world. In my opinion though, there are just some things more important than the almighty dollar, and my family is one of those things. There's plenty of jobs everywhere you look. Some people just aren't willing to do some of these jobs. There's no way I'd be away from my family for the better part of a year for a job. I'd shovel $hit in h3ll if it meant I'd see my family every night.
2006-06-25 08:18:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by El 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
my husband and i have been married for over 5 yrs. he is in the united states military. as such he is deployed for months at a time, sometimes as long as a year.
i hate it, he hates it, but its his job. i have accepted and supported his decision to stay in the military. i miss him dearly, BUT what we have is awesome, i would NEVER miss the chance to be in his life the way i am now. i take what time i am gIven with my husband like i would a precious gift. ive seen ppl throw away a marriage because of distance, and i find it very sad. a marriage is a hard job, is a living thing, it needs tending to, and LOTS of work.
if your not willing to work at it, whats the point if your partner is a thousand miles away or in the next room!
2006-06-25 08:04:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
In that instance... It just isnt a marraige - Its 2 people seeing each other a couple of times a year.
Marraige is about being there for someone, sharing their life and of course loving them.
When you meet up again its like seeing a Stranger....
Nah - its wrong
2006-06-25 08:00:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ade 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have a friend in the military. He says that the majority of split up families that are overseas cheat. His wife was included. Its hard to sustain a long-distance marriage. That doesnt mean that its impossible. Gudluk
2006-07-07 20:22:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by diaz276 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the sacrfice is too big. It is best to not marry, becasue there will most likely be cheating. I think it too hard on the kids too. We only live one life, why be away from those you love.
2006-07-08 02:23:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by clcalifornia 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, I think it's real tough on marriage and on family life.
But, economic migrants have been around for a long long time.
2006-06-25 07:58:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ya-sai 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
can't the family move with them. if you are in a marriage i would think you would find a way to be together. separation leads to loneliness then to cheating.....the need to be with someone. Love cannot always survive separation.....find a way to be together..
2006-07-07 06:09:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by pepenbuffy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they are in a job where they know that could happen then I would think they are prepared to deal with it.
But alot of us would never marry a person where that would happen,I know myself enough to know it wont work .For me anyway.
2006-06-25 08:02:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bad idea
2006-07-05 20:23:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by emmaleigh 2
·
0⤊
0⤋