English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-24 22:46:12 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

18 answers

Yes, Elodie, I do. Different, but equal.

Funny about humans=--we think of Nature as what's "out there". But we are just as much a part of that, as any bat or bird.

The Spirit of Life is within all of us, expressed in different specialties.

A dog's specialty is Smell.
An owl's is Vision. A bat's is Sonar.( also for dolphins and whales) A rabbit's is procreation. A cat's is Stealth.

Every creature has specialized talents and perceptive arrays that adapt them to one special niche in the general Eco-system.

For humans, it's the ability to form artificial diagram "maps" in our heads, and to communicate these semi-hallucinations to other humans, creating an "un-natural" reality based on our own imaginings. And so we have wars and constant conflicts.

2006-06-24 23:32:32 · answer #1 · answered by DinDjinn 7 · 11 2

Animal brains are comparable to ROM applications in intelligent machines as embedded programmes of direct knowledge controlling all processes ie. physical actions as well as living and protection with very little free choice.Hence they have high efficiencies far surpassing any thing human. Because of access to choice over actions human efficiency is summarily halved as compared to animals needing eloberate programmes of education and training to attain any recognizable level for self sustenance. Physical efficiencies apart men are equipped with exceptional qualities of subtle consciousness relating to mind ,intellect and intelligence in the area of which animals can never equal but only serve to meet his lawful needs.However by improper choice and irrational conduct causing severe harm unto themselves and damage to his living environment men drop far below the requirements of righteous living as compared to animals who prey upon each other for a living but man out of greed and hatred kills indicriminately.

2006-06-25 08:37:11 · answer #2 · answered by sastry m 3 · 0 0

"I think animals everywhere would be annoyed at the comparison."
I agree. Coz animals are definitely superior to humans. Exactly for that "brain" they don't have.They just live and enjoy it, die and enjoy it. They don't feel like **** somedays and they don't wonder bout the future, or whine about the past. They live in the present. Which seems to me is the highest thing you could do being alive.

2006-06-25 11:26:12 · answer #3 · answered by Ayce c 1 · 1 0

i think men are Superior to animals because they have a more developed brain .Men can think and act.He can make the world a better place if he wish.May be animals are more gifted physically but man with his unique capacity to think,imagine and speak is better in his capacity to execute things.I do agree that men some cases become animals in the Way he do things but he has the capacity to do better if he wishes

2006-06-25 06:42:05 · answer #4 · answered by jose p 2 · 0 1

According to women, men *are* animals. So one could say they are equals.

Of course, since women are better than men, they are quite a bit better than animals.

So i guess it all depends on whether or not you are a woman.

2006-06-25 17:18:31 · answer #5 · answered by missinglincoln 6 · 0 0

Yes. Every creature was put here for a reason. Maybe we don't know all the reasons, but nevertheless, we all belong. Funny how animals don't murder, rape, start wars, are hurtful, mean, abuse children and are curel to their own.

2006-06-25 08:07:29 · answer #6 · answered by mcghankathy 4 · 1 0

I think some animals are more evolved than some humans..they have learned to love unconditionally

2006-06-25 10:23:19 · answer #7 · answered by blue_lotus 2 · 0 0

My dog can outrun me but I can juggle better than him. So maybe that equals us out.

2006-06-26 04:53:09 · answer #8 · answered by Uri 3 · 0 0

if men didn't use their qualified brains..then they would be equal to animals..and if they didn't use their hearts..they would be less than animals...

2006-06-25 06:16:31 · answer #9 · answered by donia f 4 · 0 1

I think animals everywhere would be annoyed at the comparison.

-Dio

2006-06-25 06:02:36 · answer #10 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers