are you for or against it?
why/why not?
2006-06-24 21:18:25 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Primary & Secondary Education
it's disgusting. definitely against it.
2006-06-24 21:23:00 · answer #1 · answered by mig 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Totally against! I can't understant that "need" neither to be with the people of same sex nor marriages with those people. Marriage is when men and women love each other that much so they want to spend their lives forever, but unfortunately these "loves" don't last forever. Marriage is not for two men, or two women! That's completely crazy! It is not natural. If it was normal, they could have children like normal couples, couldn't they? And after all, homo people want more. They want to adopt children. Hello, where are your heads?! Children are blessings and crowns of love, and they are not dedicated to homo people. I get a headache of even imagining about that poor child from homo "families". That child would be lost. Parents would give him/her bad exaamples of what to do, how to behave... Neither can two mothers replace a father, nor can two fathers replace a mother. Mother, father and babies form a FAMILY! HUSBAND and WIFE form a MARRIAGE!
2006-06-25 01:21:01 · answer #2 · answered by Jovan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was raised to believe that marriage is for 2 people that love each other dearly to show the world that they are in love and are committed to each other. None of that traditional stuff, we are in the 21st century after all. Whether you are straight or gay...
I am for it!I happen to know a few gay couples that are married, and they are happier and more respectful of each other than most of the straight couples I know. If we straight people can get married why not gays or lesbians? I am glad that the country where I live has accepted gay marriages. More should.
2006-06-24 21:54:19 · answer #3 · answered by Nizoja 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For it, it shouldn't matter what orientation you are, you shouldn't be able to not marry someone you really love just because they're the same sex as you, a lot of people disagree with homosexual marriages, because it they say they're for it that suppose that means they're gay, I think the same way people are racist they are descrimating.......homophobia, what the h-e-double hockey sticks is that...i can c scared of point objects, being inclosed but being afraid of a people's orientation is just stupid!! I'm totally for homosexually, even if I'm not, that's not the point, I stand up for what I believe in, and with your question I'm standing up, a lot of people think of religion, but i think god created us to live the life, we want, just don't make any big mistakes, I don't god cares what color skin you are, what your religion is or what...and plus homosexuals can reproduce, they have clinics for that type of stuff, they may not be able to do it together but so what!!
***standing up***
2006-06-24 21:35:59 · answer #4 · answered by ~ ♥ Sun$hine ♥ ~ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am against homosexual marriages because God intended us to multiply and replenish the earth. You certainly can't do that with the same sex.
2006-06-24 21:31:19 · answer #5 · answered by Happy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm totally for these American citizens having the same rights I do as a hetrosexual, which is the right to marry a consenting adult they love. Being a veteran, it just boils me to see so many stupid Americans fighting against it.
2006-06-30 02:44:04 · answer #6 · answered by American Spirit 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is no longer something morally incorrect with 2 people of the comparable gender residing below one roof and sharing residing expenditures and different widely used jobs. it rather is morally incorrect for them to have interplay in comparable gender intercourse. the government is incorrect in limiting specific reward to purely male-woman kin partnerships. If 2 people opt to variety a kin partnership below civil regulation, the concern of no remember if or no longer they have intercourse should not be a ingredient to a mundane government (purely to non secular agencies). The term "marriage" has been used for hundreds of years to describe the male-woman kin partnership. it rather is a factor of the heterosexual identity (the two civil and spiritual). it is not good for the LGBT community to scouse borrow that identity as a shortcut to gaining specific reward. they ought to advance words that are specific to their variety of partnerships and then be certain that all and sundry kin partnerships (of which marriage may be one type) have the comparable reward.
2016-10-31 10:59:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For it,,, whats the big deal, if 2 people love and adore each other & are committed - why does it have to be a secret? True love is hard to find,, if they are lucky to find each other... lets all take notes on how they did it....
2006-06-24 21:22:44 · answer #8 · answered by cutienoz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i have nothing against homosexuals, so they can do whatever they like.
2006-06-24 21:48:21 · answer #9 · answered by Josie V 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not a long term prospect at all..just till the initial euphoria fades away
2006-06-24 21:23:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋