I mean, theres so much evidence to think this (tomkat, baby) is all the biggest publicity coverup of all time...reguarding rumors in early 2005 of Tom Crusies sexual orientation (which if/is true, can be devistating to his career, and send shockwaves through Hollywood!)
Evidnce includes...
-The "Oprah Incident" (that had "planned" written all over it)
-Tom firing his sister as his publicist for John Travoltas famed publicist before the Tomkat story broke (Which BTW, Travoltas publicist is notorious for doing "dirty buisness", i.e.-listening on phone calls, ect...)
-Tomkat emerging JUST IN TIME, for war of the worlds and Batman theatre release
-getting preggers JUST IN TIME for the war of the worlds and batman DVD releases!
-Katies weird misplaced belly bump
-giving birth JUST IN TIME for MI3!
-No baby pictures
-No spoken of wedding
..among other things.
and why am I so in depth with this you ask?! Because Im a Public Relations minor that would love to enter the buisness one day
2006-06-24 20:03:46 · 8 answers · asked by woah 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
in response to rattwagon - So they killed Suri??
2006-06-24 20:18:19 · update #1
hmmmm now that u mention it im begining to wonder if she does exist, cause we havent seen pics or stories of her like we did 4 brangelinas tyke..........
2006-06-24 20:09:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I read on website that to appease the Scientologist Gods, Suri needed to be sacrificed in order to be reincarnated. As the scripture reads, Suri will be reborn to another Scientologist member and placed back in the hands of TomKat for safe keeping.
2006-06-24 20:15:54 · answer #2 · answered by rattwagon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no BABY!!! It is all a lie, i mean c'mon we've seen Michael Jackson's kids, and he's crazy in the coconut!! Katie was never pregnant and Tom Cruise has a questionable sexual orientation!!!
2006-06-26 11:50:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
OKAY LISTEN UP.
no baby pictures because brangelina just had their baby pictures out. tom wants to get hte baby pictures out afterwards and steal back the spotlight.
no speak of wedding because nicole kidman and keith urban are having theirs today. so they have to wait. it's this weird thing. nicole was gonna have hers earlier but tom didn't want to go because katie was stilll preggers AND unmarried. so nicole waited and now its time for tom to wait. (btw nicole adn tom used to date....for quite a while. nad they adopted two kids. that's why all the waiting....)
and the coincidence isn't much proof. angelina had her baby JUST IN TIME so that it'd be the same time jennifer aniston had THE BREAK UP out. which is totally mean. to steal the spotlight. as if it isn't enough that you stole her man, her future AND her baby.
2006-06-24 23:01:03 · answer #4 · answered by callieRach 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is strange we haven't seen any pictures or heard anymore about that baby. I wonder if she really did have a baby or if it was really Tom's. But then again Tom has no movie to do PR for right so thats why no baby pictures.
2006-06-25 04:26:00 · answer #5 · answered by sunshine 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I also heard that Tom Cruise is gay, so we never know what's actually going on with them.
2006-06-24 20:24:23 · answer #6 · answered by laurennn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ok... i kinda agree now that u mentioned it and come up with some evidence and some statements that support the fact that what u say could actually be true...
2006-06-24 20:20:16 · answer #7 · answered by whitelighter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.eonline.com/Gossip/Awful/Daily2006/060615.html
They did not get enough for her picture. Read the story here
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200911,00.html
2006-06-24 20:34:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋