I asked the question "Reaction to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's plan for national reconciliation?" 7 hours ago and received no answer. Is there no one out there who is smart enough or cares enough to try to answer? Oh wait, Saturday night must be Slacker night. By definition Slackers are stupid. Never mind.
2006-06-24 15:56:42 · 12 answers · asked by lesser_wizard 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Read the article
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13521628/site/newsweek/
For jgmafb- You're welcome to come over and try it. Are you and your dogs faster than my Glock?
2006-06-24 16:44:53 · update #1
Seven hours ago I was at work. And I only look for questions on the first page and those asked by posters I'm familiar with.
And by definition, slackers are lazy, not stupid. So if I trouble myself to look up your original question, will you give me best answer?
2006-06-24 16:08:02 · answer #1 · answered by meathead76 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Honestly, I work and go to school so i don't have time to watch the news, so i never heard about that plan by the prime minister.
I would like to know more about a subject before I answer a question.
PS: we're not "stupid slackers" we just have jobs we need to attend saturday nights
2006-06-24 16:01:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I consider myself very politically astute. I try to keep up on all current events. I watch Fox News for information and read Al-Jezeera online to see what how foreigners are perceiving U.S. actions around the globe.
Maybe it's my busy schedule, and the fact I'm reading Ann Coulter's new book, "Godless" (which turns out to be a lot more of a demanding read than I counted on), but I didn't hear about the Iraqi Prime Minister's plans.
Sorry, I guess your question is a bit too arcane for us.
2006-06-24 16:14:20 · answer #3 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My pal, i admire your (nicely) progressed concepts, even however i'm obliged by potential of my "faith" to disagree with you. you're making a factor to show that we can't practice what we can't see (because of the fact the definition of technological know-how) yet you're making no connection to each and all the example wherein we've seen god's artwork in action. you state that the religious p.c.. and decide all of their convictions in accordance to those that maximum benefit their reason, yet you do no longer take be conscious of the great miracles of our time. case in point, whilst the prophet mohhamed ascended to heaven from his factor of death, leaving the rock on which he stood nonetheless soaring, or each and all the infinite miracles the prophet jesus executed. all of those movements are doubted by potential of the "scientific" community on the muse that they are inconceivable (like your unicorn occasion) yet they are in a position to't be of course discredited. once you're nonetheless confident interior the potential of technological know-how (as i'm specific you're) i ask you with the utmost sincerity and interest here questions to your technological know-how to respond to; If an atom won't be in a position to be created or destroyed, the place did the 1st atom or the subsequent and so on come from?, If technological know-how is the commentary of occurances in nature, what set those occurances into action? If guy is in a position to application a working laptop or computing gadget to accomplish any activity needed, who then programed guy with such potential and incredible anatomical effectiveness? If the universe stareted with a bang, what filled the empty area (the infinite quantities of area, that permit the universe to continuosly increase) until now hand? and on and on I additionally want to show out that an theory is an commentary that has yet to be shown (or might even have been shown), yet an theory purely explains HOW a definite technique works, it does not clarify the way it started or greater importantly WHY. the full question of our life and our purpose in this earth (besides because of the fact the certainty that our souls are some variety of power we can't comprehend) can on no account be responded by potential of technological know-how. interior the top, we are able to all see the certainty on the top of (with any luck) long lives, a minimum of it rather is the way i see it.
2016-10-31 10:48:05 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
where did you get such information?.... I do not see any sources listed.
What I have seen on the news and read before today, is that the insurgents that will be released and offered amnesty are those that have NOT committed any killings....
I would like to see where this information is coming from....
I do have another life...and I resent you calling me and others, Stupid. That is very rude and disrespectful.
Good evening...
2006-06-24 16:10:02 · answer #5 · answered by MesquiteGal 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Elitist
2006-06-24 16:41:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
actually I spend my saturday nights looking for little wuzzies like you to kick the crap out of. then I let my dogs mount them from behind and front at the same time
2006-06-24 16:04:51 · answer #7 · answered by jgmafb 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
slackers like you ask stupid questions
2006-06-24 17:06:43 · answer #8 · answered by wolfman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, most people have a life and answering your question might have been lower on the list than say, having sex, drinking beer....
2006-06-24 15:59:59 · answer #9 · answered by Mark W 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Slacker night? whatever jack ***.. why are you on here? eh? maybe nobody gives a damn! ever thought of that?
2006-06-24 16:00:52 · answer #10 · answered by swiper_no_swiping2006 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋