2006-06-24 15:33:29 · 5 answers · asked by POOH 1 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
No, they are paying for it.
2006-06-30 01:41:52 · answer #1 · answered by CottonPatch 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nowadays they do, especially in radio. Why is it whenever a controversial series comes on broadcast TV, activist groups say that they'll boycott advertisers instead of appealing to the network to take off the series? Because TV and radio stations and networks make their money through the advertising, and if the sponsors aren't happy, then they'll get their way or else they'll take their money elsewhere.
Which is why the FCC regulating decency is such a farce, because the marketplace could do a better job of regulating it than a government agency.
2006-06-24 15:59:08 · answer #2 · answered by jasonbondshow 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A theory out of the blue. My mother has the most beautiful blue eyes that you have ever seen. One blew East, and the other blew West. And since the eyes have failed to communicate, therefore there is a cultural mass not related to the hole, as in a messy whole.
2016-03-27 03:27:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, they do! and here's why http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/?tr=y&auid=1742649 Advertisers buy time across segments, whch has a profound affect on numerous media sources. There goes freedom of the press!
2006-06-24 16:23:04 · answer #4 · answered by RON C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am sorry, but thats way to obvious. Of corse they do.
2006-06-24 16:13:21 · answer #5 · answered by darkon332 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋