2006-06-24 14:38:54 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
All I know is this, Korean's suck! big time
2006-06-24 14:55:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Simply....
.
.
.
You are wrong, Gregory!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Listen to me, pal. It's not the matter of offside only. Because of the second goal, the "FLOW" of the game is messed up. Can you call it a fair match? I don't think so.
That's a big chunk, but there's more. The referee did not call all the hand balls of SUI players. I believe SUI players knew the referee would not call because they were touching the balls by arms all the time.
And one more thing about the match with vs Italy and vs Spain. If you watch the game videos, you can see what they've done. Totti clearly did "OVERACTION" and Spain's goal was offside. I can show the clips of the two incidents. And I tell you why the second goal in SUI match is unreasonable. Don't say the defender touched the ball because according to the FIFA rules, that's still off-side. END of Discussion!!!!
2006-06-25 00:50:15 · answer #2 · answered by vacy_2006 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hello~!!! ppl, the koreans arnt only mad because the referee didnt get the offside, they are made becasue there was also two or more handballs and penalty kicks that could made the score 1:1 or even 1:2 which would make us go to the next round.!!!so dont call us crazy, there was something wrong with the referee and we want the truth, thats all...
2006-06-24 22:07:51 · answer #3 · answered by mr.pickle 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the goal changed the momentum and demoralised the team. Another example would be the famous Wenbley goal in 1966. The score was 2:2 (England-Germany) and England scored a NON-goal (the ball hit the crossbar, then the line and went out) yet the referee decided on goal. Germany HAD to attack like crazy and of course England then scored another goal. The game ended 4:2. We'll never know who would have won had the goal been disallowed !
England was World Cup champ and Germany finished second.
2006-06-24 21:45:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the mere fact that the flag went up and they all stopped playing thinking that "Frei" was offside would have still given them a little time to even the score!! Just remember the Koreans were playing really hard to even things up but the second goal really hurt their chances. They still had hope, slim but they still believed that they had time to get a goal.
2006-06-24 21:51:10 · answer #5 · answered by fifafan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many teams have suffered unfair calls and results at the hands of the inept and seemingly biased referee's at this tournament. They have all voiced their opinions and rightly so, but none more so than those angered at this result. A rematch is out of the question . Why should they be given any preferential treatment in a rematch over other sides with more legitimate concerns. It's over now and all they can do is look toward 2010.
2006-06-24 21:46:27 · answer #6 · answered by andygurl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If a call goes your way, you will smile it off, if it doesn't you will blame Fifa. That's how it works. Anyone remember the calls in favor of Korea against Spain and Italy in the 2002 knock out round?
2006-06-24 22:40:25 · answer #7 · answered by oranjeesoccer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This isn't because I'm a Korean, but it's unfair. maybe if the ref would've called upside, then maybe the korean players would've had faith instead of being shocked at the fact that Swiss put in another goal. with their faith maybe they would've scored. think about it as if your korean dude.
2006-06-24 21:44:03 · answer #8 · answered by curious person 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
coz they are sore losers....they got so used to cheating and advancing by cheating.......good that they are out .... I feel so good
2006-06-25 10:19:26 · answer #9 · answered by Scared 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is very fair!
2006-06-25 04:37:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋