English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Zarqawi....no big deal....
WMD's....no big deal...Bush planted those.
Plot to blow up Sears Tower thwarted? Bush made that up too...
You guys are backing yourselves into an awful small corner...

2006-06-24 12:55:27 · 18 answers · asked by loubean 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

If you look back in history...all Presidents during times of war had low ratings...it goes with the territory. And, since when to libs have the upper hand?

2006-06-24 13:05:15 · update #1

18 answers

I Love this question and love some of the answers you got.

The sears tower guys where no big deal and didn't have that much training?? (To the liberal above me) Neither did the 9/11 hijackers, MORON!

The WMD's that where found, even though they where old, can kill an entire city!!! This stuff is not like a simple pill that goes bad that wont work, this stuff will still kill MILLIONS of people.
Zarqawi was a HUGE deal! It stunned the terrorist and it helped us find a lot more of what they are about. Remember the letters and the secrets we just happened to find in the computers they had?

Liberalism is DANGEROUS!!! Especially in time of war. You people would rather see the USA DESTROYED before you would want one military person to go fight. You refuse to fight yourself, don't tie us down too!

ADDITION:
CANTCU:
First, I DOUBT you where ever in the Military. No true military man would espouse of the rubbish you are spewing! Bush did not kill these men, TERRORIST DID! If you lived one day in Vietnam, you would know what it was like to fight an unknown enemy! They killed our soldiers with babies and children! They where not defending themselves from the USA, but in aggression against the Southern Vietnamese people!
I would spit on ANY person, including those who claim to be a real soldier, who would say such damning things about our men, women and our Commander in Chief. You are the lowest form of scourge.

2006-06-24 13:13:27 · answer #1 · answered by lancelot682005 5 · 1 4

I'm a conservative and the only thing in American history that I feel was indeed a conspiracy was the Kennedy assassination November 22, 1963. I think it's great that Zarqawi is dead and those plotting to blow up the Sears Towers were caught. Liberals plainly just do not want the Bush administration to be given credit for anything.

2006-06-25 06:58:27 · answer #2 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0 0

What wmd's ? Do you mean the ones we gave Saddam in the 80's ! The ones that were already deteriorated and had been for years ! Zarqawi was only a pawn and has already been replaced even Rummy said he was a small player in the grand scheme of things and as for a plot to blow up the sears tower being stopped , what do they want a medal for doing there job's for once !

Liberals don't think every thing is a conspiracy , we just take them for there true value instead of blowing them out of proportion !

2006-06-24 13:11:53 · answer #3 · answered by here to help 3 · 0 0

I think it's great Zarqawi is dead... and it should help our efforts in Iraq... The White House and DOD both said the WMD weren't a big deal, if you have a problem with that, take it up with them...
The sears tower thing was great, but I thought we were fighting terrorists over there so we wouldn't have them over here... yet here they are?

But those are all relatively small unimportant issues that do nothing to explain HUGE greater issues... like why are we in Iraq? and were is Osama who killed 3,000 people?

I like how you try to focus on the trees and don't look at the whole forest though... it's nice...

I think you guys are in quite a corner yourselves... you hold up small victories like you won the war... I'm not even sure you know who you're fighting...

2006-06-24 13:12:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

To slur Lancelot, my last memories of Nam were at a little place called Khe Sahn during Tet in 68. When I woke up, i was shy a part of my left foot and covered in shrapnel wound, a piece of which I still carry in my neck. When, I recovered, the Marines gave me a PH, a brownie button and kick in the *** out of the Corps.

I was a Liberal then and a Liberal now. Vietnam was a government policy disaster because of stubborn adherence to muddleheaded dogma, misplaced bravado, lack of significant, genuine allied support and porous boarders where anything and everything could come through. All this, not to mention we never gained the hearts and minds of the people which is hard when their lives are turned upside down everyday.

The Vietnamese had been fighting a war of independence for 1000 years with the Chinese and had not lost. We discounted their resolve, ability and willingness to die for their cause. Sound familiar?

Now I don't know what supply shack, slop mess or latrine pits you dug and burned, but it makes me wonder just how full it you are when you say it liberalism that's the problem in war. That is diversionary from fact and meant to confuse. Policy, plans, goals, intelligence and the ability to secure containment are the factors of successful warfare.

So desist from blaming some group for bad policy in government, faulty intelligence, arrogance and false bravado without cause. That's an order BOOT!

2006-06-24 14:36:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Um, they also claim that 9/11 was all Bush just blowing stuff up looking for a war, and the July 7 London bombings... fake too... what do you do? Vote Republican and hope the country doesn't turn socialist, because I don't know how many terrorist attacks we can call fake before the people stop looking at liberals with respect.

2006-06-24 13:03:23 · answer #6 · answered by rliedtky 2 · 0 0

1. Killing Zarqawi was no big deal. He was replaced with a few days.

2. What WMDs? Do you mean the 20 year old useless toxic waste they recently found?

3. Let's see...the group had no training, no financing, no money at all. Yeah, they were a huge threat.

2006-06-24 13:00:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Use your head litlle girl!
Believing that nearly everything coming out of the BUSH-white house is a conspiracy has more to do with one using basic common sense.
It has nothing whatsoever to do with being liberal.
Hell, if that were the case, BUSH would have 100% support (in all things) from ALL conservatives in the US.
He does not have that kind of support and there are many conservatives (as well as liberals) who believe that BUSH is a free-roaming doofus!

2006-06-24 13:13:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't believe liberals can think for themselves! I resent the fact that veteran (cantu - above) disgrace the names of those fallen friends of mine, in his little petty attempt at showing his little petty backside. I don't normally get fired up, over this liberal - conservative battle, but I am a Viet Nam era veteran and a Desert Storm Veteran. I don't have to agree with the war, nor the president of the United States, but I do agree that I would not go The Wall and preach my anti war anti Bush propaganda and I wouldn't write down the names of fallen hero of any war to push my 15 minutes of fame. But will tell you I am a proud American veteran. I didn't agree with Nam, but I volunteered, I didn't agree with Desert Storm but I volunteered. I don't agree with cowards like cantu using his list to get a meaningless point across, but I do agree if this were face to face I would put a size 12 combat boot up his liberal backside! Thank A Vet

2006-06-24 14:50:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your examples look much less like conspiracy theories and greater like argumentative factors. whilst i think of of conspiracy theories i think of greater alongside the lines of "The moon landing advance into faked" and "the united statescaused 9/11". it rather is unfair to assert "liberals" as though all shared a unique view yet whilst asked as a typical view of liberals, nicely think of roughly it, Obama is liberal. Why might liberals attack their very own relatively if their very own is president?

2016-10-31 10:36:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers