Voted for Clinton 1992 and Bush in 2004 (yeah, I know, I was on a long hiatus). Anyone else like that. I don't go so much on party lines. I believe that certain leaders are good gor their times. Clinton would have had a weak response to 9/11 and Bush would have probably tinkered with the economy too much in the nineties (plus how weird would it have bee for the father to lose to his son?)
Anyway, I've seen a big change in the Dems, especially in the libs, since 1999. Seriously, some of you have lost your minds. Yeah, the republicans were gnasking their teeth from 1992-2000, but when angry republicans said stupid things like Hillary killed Vince Foster or Bill raped all those women, most normal Republicans ignored them and their extremist views.
But Bush-hating is infecting the moderates in the Dems, not just the liberals. Really, guys, dial it down a few notches. When you say Bush and Hitler in the same sentence, you just sound stupid.
Look over there. It's the swing voters. Wave.
2006-06-24
11:22:16
·
7 answers
·
asked by
ut78759
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
DUFFMAN- Did you even read my post? Bush Sr. in 1992 and George W in 2004 were twelve years apart. Different times call for different leaders.
2006-06-24
11:30:51 ·
update #1
CANTCU- Yeah, I'm sure they're spending countless hours going through everage Americans bank accounts and intennet histories.
2006-06-24
11:57:16 ·
update #2