If liberals are smarter than George Bush, why aren't they President?

Answer 1

because there are more idiots in the world than there are liberals.

Answer 2

Oh no! You may have jinxed the next election with this! I'm not coming back to America if Hillary gets in. Liberals are okay sometimes, but they want to spend too much money on crap that the government shouldn't even be involved in. Less Government! We need not a Republican, not a Democrat, but a Libertarian for the next President. They are thrifty and not swayed by a sob-story like many liberals are. Liberals are too close to Socialists for my liking. Republicans don't seem to ever make up their minds and stick to it.
Sorry, got a little off topic. Liberals aren't smarter than Bush, but right now, because they aren't in his strained position they cannot empathize and think they would be able to do a better job, but that is something that can never be proven without a time machine. When it comes to parties, they're all stupid in many ways, though the individuals may be brilliant, under the lights of cameras they all yellow and blur.

Answer 3

Because they're not! Liberals have no convictions, they're quick to criticize but do not provide any solutions. It takes a man with a spin to stand up and do the right thing to protect innocent people.
What's a liberals stand on what's happening in North Korea? Iran? Immigration? I know George W Bush's position. The subway bombing in New York were prevented because the government listened in on a conversation. Something liberals were strongly against. How many lives would have been lost if a liberal was President?

Answer 4

Because George Bush is and always has been politically connected. You may also want to research Diebold, phone jamming ordered by the White House, Bush vs. Gore in which the Supreme Court ordered vote counting stopped, etc.. Liberal is not synonymous with Democrat so I believe your question mistakenly flawed regardless. George W. Bush's IQ is estimated to be 91, by far the lowest of any former President while John F. Kennedy, William Clinton and Jimmy Carter are the three highest.
Do your own research, it is readily available if you are competent enough to seek it out.

Answer 5

That's really not very nice.
But anyway, it is a valid question. I love how people like to say he "stole" the election because of electoral votes. They obviously don't understand the purpose behind the electoral college. You have to win the popular vote in most states to win the election, so he did win fair and square. He got the popular vote in more states, both times.
Fact is, it really has nothing to do with intelligence. It has to do with how they appeal to the people. Clinton wasn't a genius, but he was still elected.
I know you didn't really mean for this question to be taken seriously, and are making a statement. Only problem is, just by asking the question, you're doing the same thing many liberals and Democrats are doing on here. You're speaking more from their level, instead of from where you should be, not because you're not liberal, but because you should want to be better than those immature people. It's a shame that you're not showing more maturity.

Answer 6

Don't you think that one idiot in office at a time is more than enough for the world or handle?
And as far as being smarter then Bush, well dinosaur dung is by far smarter then Bush and look how long that the dung has been around so don't you think it's time to impeach the after effect of the dung (not the dinosaur) but the other?
As I said before, the branch sure didn't fall far from the tree in the Bush family did it? But that's another story for later.

Answer 7

I like emily's answer in that you can't be an intelligent conservative, and the only way to be smart is to be a liberal. It makes me smile at how crazy they really are. I'm conservative, and i know there are tons of smart liberals out there. They just believe differently. I will try to figure out why they believe differently, but unlike most liberals, i will respect their right to think that way and vote for whom they would like to vote.

PS: to those that say that everyone in the corn belt is republican, shame on you, you are judging people you don't know for one, and second, stop thinking you are better than the people in mid america because you live closer to the coast. I'm sorry people out here have a code of ethics and morals that they derive from the bible, and that there are farmers that farm corn to feed you. As far as "country bumpkin" i'm not sure what you mean by that, but if you are insulting someone's free choice to live where they want to live as it is set down in the UN declaration of human rights, then you have some serious issues you need to work out.

Now on to your question: liberals aren't really smarter than George Bush, they just all think they exact same and they spill out the same talking points that they are told by Hollywood. They aren't president because they can't think for themselves, and they can't be independent thinkers.

Answer 8

ignorance is bliss...not only did Bush have to run against his opponent/Gore, he also had to run against the media and unfortunately, the media doesn't have to tell the truth or publicly apologize for every lie they make up and the liberals eat it up and since they don't want to know the truth they make up their own versions of the story...it's enough to make any sane person feel crazy...He's our president...if you can't give him that respect the world will never take any American seriously...clinton lied on oath to the world and now there's talks about Hillary running...it's just comical...and very very sad. And if money is all it takes, who will really be our next president...oh wait that takes using your mind...and using common sense...the silent majority (not the loud and clanky liberals) spoke when President BUSH won the election and they still can't handle it. GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!!!! What are they going to do if another republican wins this time...the democrats don't have a solid candidate that everyone will back so I guess it's going to be whah whah whah again for the next 4 years 8 years or for as long as it takes for them to put a candidate in there that we can all agree on.

Answer 9

Because the conservatives learned something the liberals have a hard time doing. The conservatives learned with regan that if they put up a likeable dummy who speaks simply everybody will vote for him and the real power people will run the government in the background. It is only a matter of time before liberals learn this idea and start putting thier own dum simple speaking candidate up for election and start winning elections and the american people have no real voice in government.

Answer 10

All those stupid people in Middle America elected George Bush. H L Menchken was right again.

Answer 11

The liberals did vote for George Bush. Liberal means someone that spends money freely. Nobody spends money more freely than George.