2006-06-24 11:08:19 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
No. It was laughable and not scary. Nothing was a surprise, nothing kept you awake at night.
2006-06-24 11:11:14 · answer #1 · answered by and yet, so .... 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I thought the first one wasn't all that scary, but at least it was ok because the whole Samara thing was new and interesting. The sequel was terrible because they really didn't have anything else to say, and what's so scary about that little boy?? They didn't even show him killing anyone, did they? And Naomi Watts' new friend/boyfriend from the newspaper was SOO annoying.
2006-06-24 18:20:19 · answer #2 · answered by flying.daggers 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm gonna have 2 go wit Ring 1 bcz the sceens were more intersting and bcz theres always a 2nd movie to evrything!!!!!
2006-06-24 18:23:39 · answer #3 · answered by banana3 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2006-06-24 18:12:04 · answer #4 · answered by stormynights3664 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think that king koong was a bad movie, because will smith was too fast for the birds flying to the east during the brisk morning sky.
2006-06-24 18:19:06 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. Tired AKA Louis the Scumbag 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but if you want to see a better version of either, check out tue japanese version (Ringu)
2006-06-24 19:26:04 · answer #6 · answered by Balzac 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, first one was definitely better!
2006-06-24 18:12:50 · answer #7 · answered by skyguy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I do think that it's better.
2006-06-24 18:11:44 · answer #8 · answered by Lil One with the big booty 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i didnt really like it the first one was more suspenseful to me
2006-06-24 18:11:20 · answer #9 · answered by sexy_enchanted2320032005 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hell nah N i G g A A
2006-06-24 18:12:37 · answer #10 · answered by always in love 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋