English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-24 10:51:18 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

9 answers

There is evidence of that, but he was found "not guilty " (this does NOT mean truly innocent, although the net effect is the same) at his trial a little while back. The jury seemed to think he WAS a bit of a sickie in that regard, but they weren't convinced he had done it that particular time.

2006-06-24 10:56:05 · answer #1 · answered by aboukir200 5 · 0 0

LOL! Remember that part in Date Movie where you can see him holding a teddy bear, trying to lure in a little boy in the background. LOL.

2006-06-24 18:01:24 · answer #2 · answered by roxy81492 4 · 0 0

I think he is a little weird but i do not think he actually did any ting. Now i wouldnt let my kids go there though

2006-06-24 17:56:24 · answer #3 · answered by Thomas T 1 · 0 0

He 'looooooooooooooooooooooooves' to touch boys.

2006-06-24 17:53:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Honestly I think yes, but I don't know the real answer, he may not.

2006-06-24 17:58:43 · answer #5 · answered by Imani 2 · 0 0

that's a good question if he did not why was he in court I WON'T LET MY CHILD GO TO NEVER LAND

2006-06-24 17:57:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He touches all of us in special and magical ways. SHAMOANAH!! WOOHOOHOO.

2006-06-24 17:58:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

duh! he's a sicko!

2006-06-24 17:53:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers