There is evidence of that, but he was found "not guilty " (this does NOT mean truly innocent, although the net effect is the same) at his trial a little while back. The jury seemed to think he WAS a bit of a sickie in that regard, but they weren't convinced he had done it that particular time.
2006-06-24 10:56:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by aboukir200 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL! Remember that part in Date Movie where you can see him holding a teddy bear, trying to lure in a little boy in the background. LOL.
2006-06-24 18:01:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by roxy81492 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he is a little weird but i do not think he actually did any ting. Now i wouldnt let my kids go there though
2006-06-24 17:56:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Thomas T 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
He 'looooooooooooooooooooooooves' to touch boys.
2006-06-24 17:53:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Honestly I think yes, but I don't know the real answer, he may not.
2006-06-24 17:58:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Imani 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
that's a good question if he did not why was he in court I WON'T LET MY CHILD GO TO NEVER LAND
2006-06-24 17:57:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He touches all of us in special and magical ways. SHAMOANAH!! WOOHOOHOO.
2006-06-24 17:58:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
duh! he's a sicko!
2006-06-24 17:53:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋